(17) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Adoption of New Accounting Standards
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU
2023-09,
Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures
(“ASU
2023-09”),
which expands disclosures in an entity’s income tax rate reconciliation table and regarding cash taxes paid both in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions. ASU
2023-09
is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. The Company adopted ASU
2023-09
on December 27, 2025 retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Adopted
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU
2024-03,
Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income – Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic
220-40):
Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses
(“ASU
2024-03”),
which expands disclosures about certain categories of expenses. ASU
2024-03
is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU
2024-03
on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 24, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 24, 2025
2023Feb 26, 2024
2022Feb 24, 2023
2021Feb 18, 2022
2020Feb 23, 2021
2019Feb 21, 2020
2018Feb 22, 2019
2017Feb 23, 2018
2016Feb 24, 2017
2015Feb 19, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.