Income Tax Disclosures

 

In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which focuses on the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid (ASU 2023-09). ASU 2023-09 requires a public business entity (PBE) to disclose, on an annual basis, a tabular rate reconciliation using both percentages and currency amounts, broken out into specified categories with certain reconciling items further broken out by nature and jurisdiction to the extent those items exceed a specified threshold equal to or greater than 5% of the amount computed by multiplying pretax income or loss by the applicable statutory income tax rate. In addition, all entities are required to disclose income taxes paid, net of refunds received disaggregated by federal, state/local, and foreign taxes and by jurisdiction if the amount is at least 5% of total income tax payments, net of refunds received. The Company has adopted ASU 2023-09 for the year ended December 31, 2025 and has retrospectively adjusted disclosures for the year ended December 31, 2025. Otherwise, the adoption of ASU 2023-09 had no impact on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations, or statements of cash flows.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 26, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 3, 2025
2023Mar 4, 2024
2022Mar 30, 2023
2021Mar 31, 2022
2020Mar 25, 2021
2019Mar 18, 2020
2018Mar 29, 2019
2017Mar 14, 2018
2016Mar 23, 2017
2015Mar 15, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.