Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which requires companies to disclose additional information about income taxes, primarily their rate reconciliation information and income taxes paid. The new guidance requires companies to disclose in their rate reconciliation table additional categories of information about federal, state and foreign income taxes and to provide more details about the reconciling items in some categories if the items meet a quantitative threshold. Additionally, companies will be required to disclose annually income taxes paid (net of refunds received) disaggregated by federal, state and foreign taxes and to disaggregate the information by jurisdiction based on a quantitative threshold. The guidance is effective for the Company for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2026, and early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted this guidance for its fiscal year ended January 31, 2026 on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this standard did not have a material financial impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Disaggregation—Income Statement Expenses. In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, which requires disclosures about specific types of expenses included in the expense captions presented on the Statement of Operations as well as disclosures about selling expenses. The guidance is effective for annual filings for the Company's fiscal year beginning February 1, 2027, and interim filings for the fiscal year beginning February 1, 2028, and can be applied either prospectively or retrospectively, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2024-03 on its consolidated financial statements.
Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software. In September 2025, the FASB issued an update to ASU 2025-06, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software, which removes all references to prescriptive and sequential software development stages and allows software development costs to be capitalized once management commits to funding the project and it is probable that the project will be completed and used as intended. The new guidance introduces the concept of "significant development uncertainty," which if present, prevents capitalization. The guidance is effective for annual filings for the Company's fiscal year beginning February 1, 2028, and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods, and can be applied using a prospective, retrospective, or modified transition approach, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the updates to ASU 2025-06 on its consolidated financial statements.
.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2026Mar 11, 2026Showing above
2025Mar 21, 2025
2024Mar 15, 2024
2023Mar 17, 2023
2022Mar 18, 2022
2021Mar 22, 2021
2020Mar 27, 2020
2019Apr 1, 2019
2018Mar 30, 2018

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.