Medalist Diversified, Inc. New Standards Disclosure
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Upcoming Accounting Pronouncements
Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income – Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses. The objective of ASU 2024-03 is to help investors better understand a company’s performance and prospects for future cash flows, as well as compare its performance over time with that of other companies. To meet that objective, the update requires companies to provide a tabular disclosure in the notes to the financial statements that disaggregates all relevant expense captions in continuing operations on the face of the income statement into specific expenses, gains, and losses that are outlined in the guidance. The specific items include employee compensation, depreciation, intangible lease asset amortization, impairment losses, gains or losses on long-lived assets held for disposal or disposed of, gains and losses on derivative instruments and related hedged items, and various other expenses, gains and losses. The tabular presentation must also include a total for “other items” that are not required to be otherwise itemized for each relevant expense caption. A qualitative description of the “other items” category must also be provided. ASU 2024-03 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating these disclosure requirements to determine their impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Derivatives and Hedging
In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-09 Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Hedge Accounting Improvements. The new guidance is intended to more closely align hedge accounting with the economics of an entity’s risk management activities and better reflect those strategies in financial reporting. ASU 2025-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods and is to be adopted on a prospective basis. The Company is currently assessing the impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Interim Reporting
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASC 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270) which aims to improve the navigability of ASC 270 and clarify when it applies. This includes adding a list of required interim disclosures and the addition of a requirement for reporting entities to disclose events occurring after the end of the last annual reporting period that have a material impact on the entity. The ASU is not intended to change the fundamental nature of interim reporting or expand or reduce current disclosure requirements. ASU 2025-11 is effective for interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, and can be adopted either prospectively or retrospectively to any or all periods presented. The Company is currently evaluating these disclosure requirements to determine their impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mar 2, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Feb 27, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Mar 6, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Mar 10, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Mar 16, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Mar 11, 2021 | |
| 2019 | Mar 24, 2020 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.