Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting Guidance Issued and Adopted

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09 "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures." ASU 2023-09 enhances the existing income tax disclosures primarily related to the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid information. The amendments were effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025. The Company implemented the required disclosures, including prospective application beginning in the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025, in the financial statements. See Note 12, Income Taxes.

Accounting Guidance Issued But Not Yet Adopted
In October 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-06 “Disclosure Improvements.” ASU 2023-06 clarifies or improves
disclosure and presentation requirements of a variety of topics. For entities subject to the SEC’s existing disclosure requirements, the effective date for each amendment will be the date on which the SEC’s removal of that related disclosure from Regulation S-X or Regulation S-K becomes effective, with early adoption prohibited. For all entities, if by June 30, 2027, the SEC has not removed the applicable requirement from Regulation S-X or Regulation S-K, the pending content of the related amendment will be removed from the codification and will not become effective for any entity. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU.

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03 "Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive
Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures." The ASU will improve the decision usefulness for investors by requiring public business entities to disclose more detailed information about their expenses such as (a) inventory and manufacturing expense, (b) employee compensation, (c) depreciation, (d) intangible asset amortization, etc. The amendments will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The amendments will be applied prospectively with an option for a
retrospective application. The Company is evaluating the impact of this new standard and believes that the adoption will result in additional disclosures, but does not expect it to have any other impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06 "Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software." ASU 2025-06 amends certain aspects of the accounting for and disclosure of software costs under ASC 350-40. The ASU makes targeted improvements to capitalization of costs for software developed or obtained for internal use. The amendment is expected to simplify the analysis for internal-use software cost capitalization, as entities no longer will be required to align capitalization to project stages that are not applicable to an agile development environment. The amendments will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, and interim periods within those annual reporting periods, with early adoption permitted at the beginning of a reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU and plans to early adopt with prospective application beginning in fiscal year 2027.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 19, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 26, 2025
2023Feb 28, 2024
2022Feb 28, 2023
2021Feb 28, 2022
2020Mar 31, 2021

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.