Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In December 2023, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2023-09, Income Taxes: Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (Topic 740), which establishes incremental disaggregation of income tax disclosures pertaining to the effective tax rate reconciliation and income taxes paid. This new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. The Company adopted this standard during the year ended  December 31, 2025. See Note 7 – Income Taxes.

 

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income-Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, which is intended to enhance transparency into the nature and function of expenses, primarily through additional disclosures on certain costs and expenses. This new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning with annual disclosures in 2027 and interim periods beginning in 2028. Early adoption is permitted. The standard may be applied prospectively to financial statements issued for periods after the effective date of this ASU or retrospectively. The Company is currently assessing the impact ASU 2024-03 will have on its consolidated financial statements, including its footnote disclosures.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 27, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 31, 2025
2023Mar 28, 2024
2022Mar 23, 2023
2021Mar 24, 2022
2020Mar 25, 2021
2019Mar 27, 2020
2018Feb 26, 2019
2017Mar 26, 2018

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.