NOTE 2 – RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03 "Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses" which requires disclosure about the types of costs and expenses included in certain expense captions presented on the income statement. The new disclosure requirements are effective for the Company's annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the timing and impact of adoption in its Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.

 

In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05 “Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets (Topic 326)”, which allows entities to elect a practical expedient to assume that current conditions as of the balance sheet date do not change for the remaining life of the asset in the development of a reasonable and supportable forecast as part of estimating expected credit losses. Entities electing the practical expedient are still required to adjust historical loss information to reflect current conditions to the extent that historical information does not reflect current conditions. An entity that elects to use the practical expedient is required to disclose that fact. This ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2025, with early adoption permitted. Entities should apply the practical expedient, if elected, prospectively to financial statements issued for reporting periods after the effective date. The Company is currently evaluating this ASU to determine the impact of adoption on its Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.

 

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06 “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40)”, which amends the guidance for capitalizing internal-use software developments costs. The ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption on its Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.

 

In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-09, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)” which provides targeted improvements to hedge accounting guidance. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption on its Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.

 

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11 “Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow-Scope Improvements”, which clarifies the application of interim reporting disclosure requirements and introduces a principle requiring disclosure of material events and changes since the most recent annual reporting period. The ASU is effective for interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption on its Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.

 

The Company has reviewed other recently issued accounting standards and determined that they are either not applicable or are not expected to have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2026Mar 19, 2026Showing above
2025Apr 16, 2025
2024Mar 26, 2024
2023Mar 23, 2023
2022Mar 24, 2022
2021Mar 25, 2021
2020Mar 26, 2020
2019Mar 28, 2019
2018Mar 29, 2018
2017Mar 20, 2017
2016Mar 31, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.