Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted: Other than those listed below, there were no accounting pronouncements issued during the year ended December 31, 2025, that had or would be expected to have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes.
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-10, “Government Grants—Accounting for Government Grants Received by Business Entities” (“ASU 2025-10”), to establish authoritative GAAP guidance for the recognition, measurement, and presentation of government grants received by business entities. The amendments define government grants, distinguish between grants related to assets and income, and provide criteria for when grants are recognized. Entities may elect either a deferred income approach or a cost accumulation approach for asset-related grants, while income-related grants are recognized systematically over the periods of related expenses. Additionally, ASU 2025-10 prescribes presentation options and requires disclosures about the nature, terms, and accounting policies for grants. ASU 2025-10 is effective for the Company’s fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, and may be applied prospectively or retrospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of adopting ASU 2025-10 on its financial statements and disclosures.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, “Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income Expense Disaggregation Disclosures” (“ASU 2024-03”), which amends ASC Topic 220, “Comprehensive Income,” to enhance the disclosure of expense information in the notes to the financial statements. ASU 2024-03 requires public business entities to disaggregate specified income statement expenses, such as purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, amortization, and depletion into detailed categories presented in a tabular format. Additionally, ASU 2024-03 mandates qualitative descriptions for expenses not separately disaggregated and annual disclosure of selling expenses and their definitions. ASU 2024-03 is effective for the Company’s fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027, and may be applied prospectively or retrospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of adopting ASU 2024-03 on its disclosures.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-04, “Induced Conversions of Convertible Debt Instruments” (“ASU 2024-04”), which enhances guidance in ASC Topic 470, “Debt,” to improve consistency and relevance in accounting for induced conversions of convertible debt instruments. Specifically, ASU 2024-04 clarifies criteria for when settlements should be treated as induced conversions, requiring that inducement offers preserve the form and amount of consideration issuable under original conversion terms. ASU 2024-04 is effective for the Company’s fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025, with early adoption permitted, and may be applied prospectively or retrospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of adopting ASU 2024-04 on its financial statements and disclosures.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 26, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 28, 2025
2023Feb 28, 2024

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.