Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures (“ASU 2023-07”), which amends disclosure requirements relating to segment reporting, primarily through enhanced disclosure about significant segment expenses and by requiring disclosure of segment information on an annual and interim basis. The Company adopted ASU 2023-07 as of February 1, 2024 with no material impact on its
consolidated financial statements. For further information, refer to Segment Information within Note 1 — Description of Business and Significant Accounting Policies.
In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-06, DebtDebt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and HedgingContracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40) (“ASU 2020-06”). ASU 2020-06 is intended to simplify the accounting for convertible instruments by removing certain separation models and to simplify the accounting for contracts in an entity’s own equity by eliminating the settlement criteria to qualify for a scope exception from derivative accounting. ASU 2020-06 also clarifies the diluted earnings per share calculation when convertible instruments and contracts in an entity’s own equity are involved. The Company adopted ASU 2020-06 as of February 1, 2024 with no material impact to its consolidated financial statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which requires entities to annually (1) disclose specific categories in the rate reconciliation and (2) provide additional information for reconciling items that meet a quantitative threshold (if the effect of those reconciling items is equal to or greater than 5 percent of the amount computed by multiplying pretax income (loss) by the applicable statutory income tax rate). This standard is effective for the Company for its fiscal year beginning February 1, 2026 on a prospective basis. Early adoption and retrospective application are permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statement disclosures.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses. The new guidance requires disaggregated information about certain income statement expense line items on an annual and interim basis. The standard is effective for the Company for its fiscal year beginning February 1, 2027 and interim periods within its fiscal year beginning February 1, 2028. The guidance may be applied on either a prospective or retrospective basis. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statement disclosures.
In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets, which provides a practical expedient related to the estimation of expected credit losses for current accounts receivable and current contract assets arising from transactions accounted for under Topic 606, including those assets acquired in a business combination. The practical expedient permits an entity to assume that current conditions as of the balance sheet date do not change for the remaining life of the current accounts receivable and current contract assets. This guidance is effective for the Company for its fiscal year and all interim periods beginning February 1, 2026 on a prospective basis. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software, to modernize the accounting for costs related to internal-use software to more closely align with current software development methods. The guidance removes references to project stages and clarifies when the Company is required to start capitalizing eligible costs. The guidance is effective for the Company for its fiscal year and all interim periods beginning February 1, 2028. Early adoption is permitted. The guidance may be applied prospectively, retrospectively, or via a modified prospective transition method. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270)—Narrow-Scope Improvements which clarifies interim disclosure requirements and the applicability of Topic 270. The standard is effective for the Company for all interim periods within its fiscal year beginning February 1,
2028. The guidance may be applied on either a prospective or retrospective basis. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statement disclosures.
Free Sentinel

Want the next Navan, Inc. new standards disclosure the moment it drops?

Set a Sentinel and we'll alert you the moment Navan, Inc.'s next filing hits EDGAR. No credit card, your email never gets sold.

Track for free

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.