NEKTAR THERAPEUTICS Commitments Disclosure

Note 7 — Commitments and Contingencies

Purchase Commitments

In the normal course of business, we enter into various firm purchase commitments related to contract manufacturing, clinical development and certain other items. As of December 31, 2025, these commitments were approximately $3.7 million.

Legal Matters

From time to time, we are involved in lawsuits, arbitrations, claims, investigations and proceedings, consisting of intellectual property, commercial, employment and other matters, which arise in the ordinary course of business. We make provisions for liabilities when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Such provisions are reviewed at each reporting date and adjusted to reflect the impact of settlement negotiations, judicial and administrative rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular case. Litigation is inherently unpredictable. If any unfavorable ruling were to occur in any specific period, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on the results of our operations for that period and on our cash flows and liquidity.

On August 7, 2023, we filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (the Court) against Eli Lilly and Company (Lilly) alleging, among other claims, breach of contract and breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing (the Complaint), in connection with our collaboration with Lilly. Following the denial of its motion to dismiss the Complaint entirely, Lilly filed an answer that included counterclaims against us alleging breach of specified confidentiality provisions and defamation. On September 19, 2025, Lilly filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss its counterclaims with prejudice, which the Court granted on October 7, 2025. Lilly has filed a motion for summary judgment, and the court has not yet issued a decision on this motion, as well as other pre-trial motions filed by both parties that remain pending before the Court. Following the shutdown of the federal government, on October 14, 2025, the Court postponed the previously calendared October 27, 2025 starting date of the jury trial. The Court has set a new jury trial date of September 8, 2026.

After previously authorizing and paying good and service tax (GST) refunds of approximately $3.3 million for the period of July 2017 to September 2019, the Indian GST authorities issued a show cause notice in October 2023 seeking to recover this refund, plus penalties and interest, for which we have subsequently received a demand in September 2025 seeking payment to Indian GST authorities. We have not paid the demand in view of an appeal we filed with the Indian authorities, and believe that we have meritorious defenses against the demand. We believe a loss is not probable and therefore have not accrued a liability as of December 31, 2025.

On March 6, 2026, a putative class action complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the Company, our CEO, CFO and Chief Research and Development Officer, captioned Schramke v. Nektar Therapeutics, et al. The complaint asserts claims for violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and SEC rules promulgated thereunder, seeks damages, attorneys’ fees and other relief, and alleges, among other things, that from February 26, 2025 through December 15, 2025, the defendants made misleading statements and/or failed to

disclose material information regarding the REZOLVE-AA trial. The Company denies the claims, believes they are without merit, and intends to defend vigorously against this litigation. We have not recorded a liability for this matter as of December 31, 2025.

We have recorded no liability for any litigation matters in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at either December 31, 2025 or December 31, 2024.

Indemnification Obligations

During the course of our normal operating activities, we have agreed to certain contingent indemnification obligations as further described below. The term of our indemnification obligations is generally perpetual. There is generally no limitation on the potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification obligations. To date, we have not incurred significant costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims based on our indemnification obligations. If any of our indemnification obligations is triggered, we may incur substantial liabilities. Because the aggregate amount of any of these potential indemnification obligations is not a stated amount, we cannot reasonably estimate the overall maximum amount of any such obligations. We have recorded no liabilities for these obligations in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at either December 31, 2025 or December 31, 2024.

Indemnifications in Connection with Commercial Agreements

As part of our collaboration agreements with our partners related to the license, development, manufacture and supply of our proprietary drug candidates, we generally agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless our partners from and against third party liabilities arising out of the agreement, including product liability (with respect to our activities) and infringement of intellectual property to the extent the intellectual property is developed by us and licensed to our partners. The term of these indemnification obligations is generally perpetual commencing after execution of the agreement. There is generally no limitation on the potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification obligations.

From time to time, we enter into other strategic agreements such as divestitures and financing transactions pursuant to which we are required to make representations and warranties and undertake to perform or comply with certain covenants. For example, we made certain intellectual property representations in connection with our RPI and HCR transactions, however, the time limitation we have to indemnify RPI with respect to any breach of these intellectual property-based representations and warranties has passed. In the event it is determined that we breached certain of the representations and warranties or covenants made by us in any such agreements or certain express indemnification provisions are applicable, we could incur substantial indemnification liabilities depending on the timing, nature, and amount of any such claims.

To date, we have not incurred any costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification obligations, nor any breaches of representations or warranties or covenants. Because the aggregate amount of any potential indemnification obligation is not a stated amount, we cannot reasonably estimate the overall maximum amount of any such obligations.

Indemnification of Underwriters and Initial Purchasers of our Securities

In connection with our sale of equity we have agreed to defend, indemnify and hold harmless our underwriters or initial purchasers, as applicable, as well as certain related parties from and against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Director and Officer Indemnifications

As permitted under Delaware law, and as set forth in our Certificate of Incorporation and our Bylaws, we indemnify our directors, executive officers, other officers, employees, and other agents for certain events or occurrences that may arise while in such capacity. The maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under this indemnification is unlimited; however, we have insurance policies that may limit our exposure and may enable us to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. Assuming the applicability of coverage, the willingness of the insurer to assume coverage, and subject to certain retention, loss limits and other policy provisions, we believe any obligations under this indemnification would not be material, other than retention of up to $2.5 million per incident for merger and acquisition related claims, $2.5 million per incident for securities related claims and $2.5 million per incident for non-securities related claims per our insurance policy. However, no assurances can be given that the covering insurers will not attempt to dispute the validity, applicability, or amount of coverage without expensive litigation against these insurers, in which case we may incur substantial liabilities as a result of these indemnification obligations.