NETSOL TECHNOLOGIES INC New Standards Disclosure
Recent Accounting Standards Adopted by the Company:
In November 2023, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures, which expands reportable segment disclosure requirements, primarily through enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), a description of other segment items by reportable segment, and any additional measures of a segment’s profit or loss used by the CODM when deciding how to allocate resources. The Company adopted the standard on a retrospective basis and made the required annual disclosures as of June 30, 2025. Interim disclosures are required for periods within fiscal years beginning in the first quarter of the Company’s fiscal year 2026. As the guidance only requires additional disclosure, there were no effects of adoption on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. See Note 17 – Segment Information and Geographic Areas for the segment disclosure required under this ASU.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Sep 29, 2025 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Sep 30, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Sep 27, 2022 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.