Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which enhances the transparency and decision usefulness of income tax disclosures. The amendments, among other items, require (i) additional disaggregation of income taxes paid by jurisdiction, (ii) enhanced effective tax rate reconciliation disclosures with specified categories and further disaggregation when quantitative thresholds are met, and (iii) incremental disclosures about income taxes in certain circumstances. The Company is adopting ASU 2023-09 in its annual financial statements in the current year ended December 31, 2025. The Company is applying the amendments retrospectively to all periods presented upon adoption. The amendments primarily impact disclosures and do not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Recently Issued and Not Adopted Accounting Standards

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income – Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, which will require disaggregated disclosures in the notes to the financial statements of certain categories of expenses, including purchases of inventory, employee compensation, and depreciation and amortization, that are included in expense line items within the statement of operations. ASU 2024-03 will be applied prospectively; however, retrospective application is permitted. ASU 2024-03, as clarified in ASU 2025-01, Clarifying the Effective Date, requires public business entities to adopt the guidance in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact of ASU 2024-03 on its disclosures in the notes to its financial statements.

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025‑06, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal‑Use Software (Subtopic 350‑40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal‑Use Software, which updates the guidance for capitalization of internal‑use software costs, including clarifications to the criteria for capitalizing configuration, development, and implementation activities. ASU 2025-06 is effective for the Company beginning with interim reporting for fiscal year 2029. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2025-06 on its accounting policies and related disclosures.

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025‑10, Government Grants (Topic 832): Accounting for Government Grants Received by Business Entities, which provides updated guidance on how to recognize, measure, and present government grants. ASU 2025‑10 is effective for the Company for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2028, including interim periods within those periods using a modified prospective, modified retrospective, or full retrospective transition
approach. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the effect of ASU 2025-10 on its financial statements.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, authoritative guidance, if currently adopted, would have a material impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 17, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 24, 2025
2023Mar 29, 2024
2022Mar 31, 2023
2021Mar 31, 2022

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.