Note 15. Commitments and Contingencies

Homes Purchase Commitments

As of December 31, 2025, the Company was under contract to purchase 62 homes for an aggregate purchase price of $16.1 million.

Other Purchase Obligations

The Company’s other purchase obligations principally include commitments relating to insurance, information technology, administration services, and marketing. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had other purchase obligations of $3.6 million, with $3.1 million payable within twelve months.

Lease Commitments

The Company has entered into operating lease agreements for its corporate headquarters in Tempe, Arizona and field office facilities in certain metropolitan markets in which the Company operates in the United States. Refer to Note 4. Leases, for further details.

Legal and Other Matters

The Company is subject to various actions, claims, suits and other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business, including, without limitation, assertions by third parties relating to intellectual property infringement, breaches of

contract or warranties or employment-related matters. The Company records accruals for loss contingencies when it is probable that a loss will occur, and the amount of such loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company is not currently a party to any actions, claims, suits or other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, the outcome of which, if determined adversely to the Company, would individually or in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The following is a description of pending litigation that falls outside the scope of ordinary and routine litigation incidental to the Company’s business.

Class Action Alleging Breach of Fiduciary Duties

On August 26, 2024, a purported stockholder of Offerpad (the “Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Alexander Klabin, Spencer Rascoff, Ken Fox, Jim Lanzone, Gregg Renfrew, Rajeev Singh, Robert Reid, Michael Clifton, Supernova Partners, LLC (the “Supernova Defendants”), Brian Bair, and Michael Burnett (the “Offerpad Defendants”). The case is captioned In re Supernova Partners Acquisition Co. SPAC Litigation, C.A. No. 2024-0887 (Del. Ch.) (the “Complaint”). The Complaint generally alleges that the Supernova Defendants breached their fiduciary duties, with the Offerpad Defendants aiding and abetting these breaches, in connection with the merger between OfferPad, Inc. and Supernova Partners Acquisition Company, Inc. on September 1, 2021. The Complaint seeks, among other things, monetary damages, disgorgement of any unjust enrichment, rescissory damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, and reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. On September 19, 2024, proceedings related to the Complaint were temporarily stayed. On February 24, 2025, the court dismissed the Offerpad Defendants and Supernova Partners, LLC from the Complaint without prejudice, which terminated the case as to the Offerpad Defendants. On June 30, 2025, Plaintiff filed a notice lifting the stay, which became effective immediately. In October 2025, the parties reached an agreement in principle to resolve the matter, which remains subject to court approval that is expected to occur during the second quarter of 2026. The Company’s accrual associated with this matter as of December 31, 2025 reflects the terms of the agreement in principle to resolve the matter. Notwithstanding such agreement, in regard to the remaining allegations against the remaining Supernova Defendants, because of the many questions of fact and law that may arise, the outcome of this legal proceeding remains uncertain at this point.

About Commitments Disclosures

Commitments and contingencies disclosures catalog a company's off-balance-sheet obligations and legal exposures — purchase commitments, guarantee arrangements, pending litigation, and regulatory proceedings. These items represent potential future cash outflows that may not appear as liabilities on the balance sheet until they become probable and estimable.

Key signals: litigation reserves and disclosed loss ranges quantify management's estimate of legal exposure, but unquantified "reasonably possible" losses often represent the larger risk. Watch for changes in language around pending cases — shifts from "remote" to "reasonably possible" or increases in estimated loss ranges signal deteriorating outcomes. Unconditional purchase obligations and take-or-pay contracts create fixed cost structures that reduce operational flexibility. Guarantee arrangements for subsidiaries or joint ventures can create cascading obligations. Compare the total commitment schedule against projected free cash flow to assess whether the company can meet its obligations without additional financing.