New accounting pronouncements.
Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses. In November 2024, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2024-03, “Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses.” ASU 2024-03 is intended to enhance transparency into the nature and function of expenses. The amendments require, on an annual and interim basis, new financial statement disclosures disaggregating prescribed expense categories within relevant income
statement expense captions. This standard will be applicable for the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2027 and in periodic reports thereafter. The adoption of ASU 2024-03 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, but will require additional disclosures when adopted in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2027 and in periodic reports thereafter.
There are no other new accounting pronouncements that are expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 13, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 18, 2025
2023Feb 16, 2024
2022Feb 17, 2023
2021Feb 15, 2022
2020Feb 16, 2021
2019Feb 14, 2020
2018Feb 14, 2019
2017Feb 15, 2018
2016Feb 16, 2017
2015Feb 19, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.