Recently adopted accounting pronouncements
In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2023-09 ("ASU 2023-09"), Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, that enhances the transparency of income tax disclosures by expanding annual disclosure requirements related to the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid. The Company adopted this guidance on a prospective basis for its annual year ending December 31, 2025 and all interim periods thereafter. Prior period disclosures have not been adjusted to reflect the new disclosure requirements. See Note 15 for further detail.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03 ("ASU 2024-03"), Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, which is intended to improve disclosures about a public business entity's expenses, primarily through additional disaggregation of income statement expenses. ASU 2024-03 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating ASU 2024-03 to determine the impact on the Company's disclosures.
In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-05 ("ASU 2025-05"), Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivables and Contract Assets, which introduces a practical expedient for the application of the current expected credit loss model to current accounts receivables and contract assets. ASU 2025-05 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2025, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating ASU 2025-05 to determine the impact on the Company's financial statements and disclosures.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-06 ("ASU 2025-06"), Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software, which updates the cost capitalization threshold for internal-use software development costs by removing all references to software project development stages and provides new guidance on how to evaluate whether the probable-to-complete recognition threshold has been met. ASU 2025-06 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating ASU 2025-06 to determine the impact on the Company's financial statements and disclosures.
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-12 ("ASU 2025-12"), Codification Improvements, to make other incremental improvements to U.S. GAAP. The update represents changes to the Codification that clarify, correct errors in or make other improvements to a variety of topics that are intended to make it easier to understand and apply. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating ASU 2025-12 to determine the impact on the Company's financial statements and disclosures.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 20, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 21, 2025
2023Feb 16, 2024
2022Feb 21, 2023
2021Feb 18, 2022
2020Feb 19, 2021
2019Feb 26, 2020
2018Feb 22, 2019
2017Feb 23, 2018
2016Feb 22, 2017
2015Feb 26, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.