Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc New Standards Disclosure
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncement
In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2023-09 Income Taxes (Topic 740) – Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (“ASU 2023-09”), which requires public business entities to disclose specific categories in the income tax rate reconciliation annually and provide additional information for reconciling items that meet a qualitative threshold. ASU 2023-09 also requires that entities disclose annually additional information about income taxes paid and disaggregated information for certain items. The Company adopted ASU 2023-09 retrospectively for fiscal years beginning on January 1, 2025. The impact of the adoption of this standard was limited to certain enhanced disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. See Note 13 to these consolidated financial statements for disclosures related to the adoption of this guidance.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncement Not Yet Adopted as of December 31, 2025
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-11 Interim Reporting (Topic 270) – Narrow Scope Improvements (“ASU 2025-11”), which clarifies interim disclosure requirements. ASU 2025-11 also requires entities to disclose events since the end of the last annual reporting period that have a material impact on the entity. This guidance is effective for the Company for interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning on January 1, 2028. Early adoption is permitted. The guidance may be applied either (1) prospectively or (2) retrospectively to any or all prior periods presented in the financial statements. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03 Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income – Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (“ASU 2024-03”), which requires detailed disclosures about specified categories of expenses (including employee compensation, depreciation, and amortization) included in certain expense captions presented on the face of the income statement. ASU 2024-03 is effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning on January 1, 2027, and for interim periods within fiscal years beginning on January 1, 2028. Early adoption is permitted. The guidance may be applied either (1) prospectively to financial statements issued for reporting periods after the effective date of ASU 2024-03 or (2) retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements and continues to evaluate disclosure presentation alternatives.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Feb 25, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Feb 21, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Feb 27, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Mar 15, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Feb 28, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Mar 10, 2021 | |
| 2019 | Mar 10, 2020 | |
| 2018 | Mar 12, 2019 | |
| 2017 | Mar 7, 2018 | |
| 2016 | Mar 7, 2017 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.