In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280)—Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures. The ASU requires that an entity disclose significant segment expenses impacting profit and loss that are regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker. The update is required to be applied retrospectively to prior periods presented, based on the significant segment expense categories identified and disclosed in the period of adoption. The amendments in this ASU are required to be adopted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2023-07 for fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. The adoption did not have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations but did result in expanded segment disclosures within the notes of the financial statements.

Free Sentinel

Want the next Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. new standards disclosure the moment it drops?

Set a Sentinel and we'll alert you the moment Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s next filing hits EDGAR. No credit card, your email never gets sold.

Track for free

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Sep 25, 2025Showing above
2024Sep 26, 2024
2023Sep 26, 2023
2022Oct 13, 2022
2021Sep 17, 2021
2020Sep 25, 2020
2019Sep 16, 2019
2018Sep 11, 2018
2017Sep 18, 2017
2016Sep 16, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.