Recent accounting pronouncements issued and adopted
Income Tax Disclosures
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which requires disaggregated information about the Company’s effective tax rate reconciliation as well as information on income taxes paid. The new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2024, and is applied on a prospective basis, with the option to apply retrospectively. The Company adopted ASU 2023-09 prospectively in this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. The adoption impacted the Company’s income tax disclosures but did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted
Expense Disaggregation Disclosures
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income-Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, requiring public entities to disclose additional information about specific expense categories in the notes to the financial statements on an interim and annual basis. ASU 2024-03 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2024-03.
Capitalized Internal-Use Software Costs
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, Accounting for Internal-Use Software Costs (Subtopic 350-40): Clarifying the Application of Capitalization Guidance, which amends the guidance on capitalizing costs related to internal-use software. ASU 2025-06 requires public entities to apply the disclosure requirements in ASC 360-10, Property, Plant, and Equipment, to capitalized internal-use software costs, regardless of how those costs are presented in the financial statements. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2025-06.
Government Grants
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-10, Government Grants (Topic 832): Accounting for Government Grants Received by Business Entities, which establishes comprehensive guidance for recognizing, measuring, presenting, and disclosing government grants received by business entities. Under this update, entities must apply specific recognition and measurement principles for both monetary and tangible non-monetary government grants, with the accounting outcome dependent on whether the grant is related to an asset or to income. ASU 2025-10 does not apply to not-for-profit entities and employee benefit plans and excludes certain types of transactions such as exchange transactions and government guarantees. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2028, with early adoption permitted, and the Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2025-10.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 26, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 14, 2025
2023Mar 29, 2024
2022Apr 18, 2023

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.