2.3.29    Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company adopted ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. This update requires enhanced disaggregation and transparency of income tax disclosures, including expanded rate reconciliation and cash tax information. The adoption of ASU 2023-09 resulted in additional income tax disclosures included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements

In November 2024, the SEC adopted final rules under Release No. 33-11275, Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (ASU 2024-03). The rules require registrants to provide enhanced disclosures regarding the disaggregation of certain operating expense categories. The new disclosures are required on an annual basis for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026 for large accelerated filers, and interim period disclosures are required beginning in the first quarterly report for the year after adoption. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the final rules.

There are no other recently issued accounting pronouncements pending adoption that are applicable or expected to have a material impact on the Company.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 2, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 27, 2025
2023Feb 28, 2024
2022Feb 27, 2023
2021Feb 25, 2022
2020Mar 1, 2021
2019Mar 2, 2020
2018Feb 28, 2019
2017Mar 14, 2018
2016Mar 15, 2017

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.