.
Income Tax Disclosures. In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU 2023-09, "Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures", which enhances income tax disclosure requirements for all entities by requiring specified categories and greater disaggregation within the rate reconciliation table, disclosure of income taxes paid by jurisdiction and providing clarification on uncertain tax positions and related financial statement impacts. ASU 2023-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024 (year ending December 31, 2025 for the Company). The Company adopted ASU 2023-09 for the year ended December 31, 2025 on a prospective basis. See Note 13, "Income Taxes," for additional details on new disclosures.

Financial Instruments - Credit Losses. In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, "Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets", which provides a practical expedient that all entities can use when estimating expected credit losses for current accounts receivable and current contract assets arising from transactions accounted for under ASC 606. ASU 2025-05 is effective for the Company for fiscal year ending December 31, 2026. The Company adopted the practical expedient of ASU No. 2025-05 on October 1, 2025. The adoption did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. See Note 1(n), "Allowance for Credit Losses," for additional details on new disclosures.
(e) Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses. In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, "Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses", which requires public entities to disclose disaggregated information about certain income statement expense line items annually and in interim periods. ASU 2024-03 is effective for the Company beginning in the December 31, 2027 Form 10-K and for interim periods beginning in the March 31, 2028 Form 10-Q.

Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal Use Software. In September 2025, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2025-06, "Intangibles, Goodwill and Other Internal-Use Software" (Subtopic 350-40), which removes all references to prescriptive and sequential software development stages (referred to as "project stages") throughout Subtopic 350-40 and specifies new requirements for determining when to begin capitalization of capitalizable project costs. ASU 2025-06 is effective for the Company beginning in December 31, 2027 Form 10-K and for interim periods beginning in the March 31, 2028 Form 10-Q. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating this ASU to determine the impact it will have on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 27, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 28, 2025
2023Feb 16, 2024
2022Feb 17, 2023
2021Feb 22, 2022
2020Feb 19, 2021
2019Feb 24, 2020
2018Feb 25, 2019
2017Mar 1, 2018
2016Feb 24, 2017
2015Feb 12, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.