Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Income Taxes

In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2023-09 Income Taxes (Topic 740) Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. ASU 2023-09 requires companies to disclose, on an annual basis, specific categories in the effective tax rate reconciliation and provide additional information for reconciling items that meet a quantitative threshold. In addition, ASU 2023-09 requires companies to disclose additional information about income taxes paid. Effective January 1, 2025, the Company adopted ASU 2023-09 on a prospective basis. See “—Income Taxes” above and Note 13 – Income Taxes for more information.

Income Statement

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03 Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income – Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40) Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses. ASU 2024-03 requires disclosure of specified information about certain costs and expenses in the notes to the financial statements. ASU 2024-03 will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027. ASU 2024-03 can be applied either prospectively to financial statements or retrospectively to any prior periods presented in the financial statements. The Company is evaluating the disclosure impact of ASU 2024-03.

Financial Instruments - Credit Losses

In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-05 Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326). ASU 2025-05 clarifies guidance related to Topic 326 for current accounts receivable and current contract assets arising from transactions accounted for under Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, allowing for a practical expedient that assumes that current conditions as of the balance sheet do not change for the remaining life of the asset. ASU 2025-05 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2025, and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the disclosure impact of ASU 2025-05.

Government Grants

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-10 Government Grants (Topic 832). ASU 2025-10 establishes authoritative guidance on the recognition, measurement and presentation of government received by business entities. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2028, with early adoption permitted. The guidance is applied on a modified prospective, a modified retrospective, or a retrospective transition approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption on the Consolidated Financial Statement and disclosures.

Interim Reporting

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-11 Interim Reporting (Topic 270). ASU 2025-11 clarifies guidance related to Topic 270 for interim disclosure requirements. The objective of the amendment is to provide clarity about the current requirements rather than evaluate whether to expand or reduce interim disclosure requirements. ASU 2025-11 is effective for interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the disclosure impact of ASU 2025-11.

The Company reviewed all other recently issued accounting pronouncements and concluded that they were either not applicable or not expected to have a significant impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 25, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 28, 2025
2023Feb 28, 2024
2022Mar 1, 2023
2021Mar 23, 2022

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.