Accounting Standards Updates
In December 2025, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow-Scope Improvements, which clarifies the guidance in Topic 270 to improve the consistency of interim financial reporting. The ASU provides a comprehensive list of required interim disclosures and introduces a disclosure principle requiring entities to disclose events since the end of the last annual reporting period that have a material impact on the entity. ASU 2025-11 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2025-11 on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-09, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Hedge Accounting Improvements ("ASU 2025-09"), which includes amendments intended to more closely align hedge accounting with the economics of a company's risk management activities. ASU 2025-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2025-09 on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-08, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Purchased Loans ("ASU 2025-08") which amends the guidance in ASC 326 on the accounting for certain purchased loans. The amendments expand the application of the "gross-up" approach for recognizing expected credit losses at acquisition to a broader category of purchased loans, referred to as purchased seasoned loans. Under this approach, the allowance for credit losses is added to the amortized cost basis of the acquired loans rather than recorded as an immediate provision for credit loss expense. The amendments align the accounting for purchased seasoned loans with the treatment of financial assets purchased with more-than-insignificant credit deterioration since origination. ASU 2025-08 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, including interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2025-08 on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-03, Business Combinations (Topic 805) and Consolidation (Topic 810): Determining the Accounting Acquirer in the Acquisition of a Variable Interest Entity ("ASU 2025-03"). The objective of this amendment is to improve the requirements for identifying the accounting acquirer in a transaction where the legal acquiree is a VIE and improve comparability between business combinations that involve VIEs and those that do not. The amendment replaces the prior GAAP requirement that the primary beneficiary of the legal acquiree is always the accounting acquirer with an assessment to determine the accounting acquirer in business combinations effected primarily by the exchange of equity interests. ASU 2025-03 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments in ASU 2025-03 must be applied prospectively to any business combination that occurs after the initial adoption date. We will apply the guidance in this update to evaluate future business combinations involving a VIE.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03 Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses ("ASU 2024-03"). The objective of this amendment is to help investors better understand a public entity's performance, better assess the entity's prospect for future cash flows, and compare the entity's performance over time and with that of other entities. The amendment will require public business entities to include a footnote disclosure about specific expenses by requiring them to disaggregate, in a tabular presentation, each relevant expense caption on the face of the income statement that includes purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, and intangible asset amortization. For any remaining items within each relevant expense caption, a qualitative disclosure is required for the amounts that are not separately disaggregated quantitatively. Additionally, the amendment provides guidance on the definition of selling expenses along with a requirement to disclose the total amount of selling expenses. The amendment does not change the requirements for the presentation of expenses on the face of the income statement. ASU 2024-03 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2024-03 on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09 Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures ("ASU 2023-09"). The objective of the amendments in ASU 2023-09 related to the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid disclosures are to improve transparency of income tax disclosures by requiring consistent categories and greater disaggregation of information in the rate reconciliation, and income taxes paid disaggregated by jurisdiction. The amendment will require that public entities on an annual basis disclose specific categories in the rate reconciliation and provide additional information for reconciling items that meet a quantitative threshold. Additionally, the amendment will require that all entities disclose on an annual basis the amount of taxes paid (net of refunds received) disaggregated by federal, state and foreign taxes as well as disaggregated by individual jurisdictions that meet a quantitative threshold. ASU 2023-09 is effective prospectively for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. We adopted this guidance on January 1, 2025 and it did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-05, Business Combinations - Joint Venture Formations (Subtopic 805-60) Recognition and Initial Measurement ("ASU 2023-05"). ASU 2023-05 addresses the accounting for contributions made to a joint venture, upon formation, in a joint venture's separate financial statements. The objectives of the amendments are to provide decision-useful information to investors and other allocators of capital in a joint venture's financial statements and reduce diversity in practice. The amendments require that a joint venture apply the following key adaptations from the business combinations guidance upon formation: (i) a joint venture is the formation of a new entity without an accounting acquirer, (ii) a joint venture measures its identifiable net assets and goodwill, if any, at the formation date, (iii) initial measurement of a joint venture's total net assets is equal to the fair value of 100 percent of the joint venture's equity, and (iv) a joint venture provides relevant disclosures. ASU 2023-05 is effective prospectively for all joint venture formations with a formation date on or after January 1, 2025. We adopted this guidance on January 1, 2025 and it did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 17, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 18, 2025
2023Feb 23, 2024
2022Feb 17, 2023
2021Feb 18, 2022
2020Feb 26, 2021
2019Feb 28, 2020
2018Feb 27, 2019
2017Feb 23, 2018
2016Feb 21, 2017
2015Feb 29, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.