Soluna Holdings, Inc New Standards Disclosure
Accounting Updates Recently Adopted by the Company
On January 1, 2021, the Company adopted ASU 2019-12 (Income Taxes (Topic 740) – Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes). This standard removes exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 for allocating tax expense between financial statement components, accounting basis differences stemming from an ownership change in foreign investments and interim period income tax accounting for year-to-date losses that exceed projected losses. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
On January 1, 2021, the Company adopted ASU 2020-01 (Investments - Equity Securities (Topic 321), Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)). This standard clarifies certain interactions between the guidance to account for certain equity securities under Topic 321, the guidance to account for investments under the equity method of accounting in Topic 323, and the guidance in Topic 815, which could change how an entity accounts for an equity security under the measurement alternative or a forward contract or purchased option to purchase securities that, upon settlement of the forward contract or exercise of the purchased option, would be accounted for under the equity method of accounting or the fair value option in accordance with Topic 825, Financial Instruments. This standard improves current GAAP by reducing diversity in practice and increasing comparability of the accounting for these interactions. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
On January 1, 2021, the Company early adopted ASU 2020-06 (Debt-Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging- Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40). ASU 2020-06 simplifies the guidance in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 470-20, Debt - Debt with Conversion and Other Options. Under ASU 2020-06, convertible instruments with embedded conversion features, that are not required to be accounted for as a derivative or that do not result in a substantial premium, are no longer required to be separated from the host contract thereby eliminating the cash conversion and beneficial conversion feature model. Instead, these convertible debt instruments will be accounted for as a single liability measured at amortized cost under the traditional convertible debt accounting model. ASU 2020-06 also requires the if-converted method to be applied for all convertible instruments when calculating diluted earnings per share. The Company has early adopted this standard for the year ended December 31, 2021. The early adoption of this standard eliminated calculating a beneficial conversion feature in relation to the SPA agreements that were entered into on October 25, 2021. Refer to Note 9 for more details.
There have been no other significant changes in the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations and cash flows as a result of its adoption of new accounting pronouncements or changes to its significant accounting policies that were disclosed in its consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.