TALPHERA, INC. Commitments Disclosure

7. Commitments and Contingencies

 

Litigation

 

On June 8, 2021, a securities class action complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the Company and two of its officers. The plaintiff is a purported stockholder of the Company. The complaint alleged that defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and SEC Rule 10b-5 by making false and misleading statements and omissions of material fact about the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures with respect to its marketing of DSUVIA. The complaint sought unspecified damages, interest, attorneys’ fees, and other costs. On December 16, 2021, the Court appointed co-lead plaintiffs. Plaintiffs’ amended complaint was filed on March 7, 2022. The amended complaint named the Company and three of its officers and continued to allege that defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and SEC Rule 10b-5 by making false and misleading statements and omissions of material fact about the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures with respect to its marketing of DSUVIA. The amended complaint also asserted a violation of Section 20A of the Exchange Act against the individual defendants for alleged insider trading. The amended complaint sought unspecified damages, interest, attorneys’ fees, and other costs. The Court granted three motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint: the first on September 28, 2022, the second on November 28, 2022, and the third, with prejudice on May 7, 2024. Judgment was entered for defendants on plaintiffs’ claims on May 7, 2024. Plaintiffs appealed the District Court’s decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. On August 20, 2025, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the District Court’s dismissal of the securities class action. 

 

On July 6, 2021, a purported shareholder derivative complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint names ten of the Company’s officers and directors and asserts state and federal claims based on the same alleged misstatements as the securities class action complaint. On September 30, 2021, October 26, 2021, and November 17, 2021, three additional purported shareholder derivative complaints were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaints name nine of the Company’s officers and directors and also assert state and federal claims based on the same alleged misstatements as the securities class action complaint. All four complaints seek unspecified damages, attorneys’ fees, and other costs. On December 6, 2021, the Court entered an order consolidating all four actions and staying the consolidated action pending the outcome of any motion to dismiss the securities class action. On September 30, 2025, the Court terminated the consolidated action, following the parties’ stipulation to dismiss the case in light of the Ninth Circuit order in securities class action.

 

On February 16, 2024, another purported shareholder derivative complaint was filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, asserting the same claims as those in the previously filed derivative actions. The case has been stayed pending the outcome of any motion to dismiss the securities class action. On October 8, 2025, plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal of the case in light of the Ninth Circuit order in the securities class action.