Recently Accounting Pronouncements - Adopted
In June 2022, the FASB issued ASU No. 2022-03, "Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Fair Value Measurement of Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions," which clarifies that a contractual restriction on the sale of an equity security is not considered part of the unit of account of the equity security and, therefore, is not considered in measuring fair value. This standard was effective for reporting periods beginning December 15, 2023. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-07, "Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures," which requires improvement on reportable segment disclosure requirements, primarily through enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses. The standard was effective for fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2023, and requires application on a retrospective basis, and for interim periods within fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2024. We adopted this standard during the fourth quarter of fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, and disclosed the significant segment expense categories that are regularly provided to the CODM on an annual basis, as well as disclosing how segment measures of profit or loss are used by the CODM. The adoption of this standard only affected our disclosures, with no impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Recently Accounting Pronouncements - Not Yet Adopted
From time to time, new accounting standards are issued by the FASB or other standard-setting bodies, and are adopted by the Company as of the specified accounting date. Unless disclosed below, there are no issued standards not yet effective that are deemed applicable to the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosure," which requires public entities, on an annual basis, (1) disclose specific categories in the rate reconciliation, and (2) provide additional information for reconciling items that meet a quantitative threshold (if the effect of those reconciling items is equal to or greater than 5% of the amount computed by multiplying pretax income/(loss) by the applicable statutory income tax rate). This ASU will be effective, for public entities, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. We are currently assessing the impact of the adoption of this ASU on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, "Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income – Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Topic 220): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses." This standard requires additional disclosure of certain amounts included in the expense captions presented on the statement of operations, as well as disclosures about selling expenses. The ASU is effective on a prospective basis, with the option for retrospective application. All public business entities are required to adopt the guidance in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. We are in the process of assessing the impact of the adoption of this ASU on our consolidated financial statements.

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.