TREACE MEDICAL CONCEPTS, INC. Commitments Disclosure
8. Commitments and Contingencies
License and Royalty Commitments
The Company has entered into product development and fee for service agreements with members of its Surgeon Advisory Board and other surgeon consultants that specify the terms under which the consultant is compensated for his or her consulting services and grants the Company rights to the intellectual property created by the consultant in the course of such services. As products are commercialized with the assistance of members of the Surgeon Advisory Board and other surgeon consultants, the Company may agree to enter into a royalty agreement if such consultant's contributions to the product are novel, significant and innovative.
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company has royalty agreements with certain members of its Surgeon Advisory Board and other surgeon consultants providing for royalties based on each individual's level of contribution. Royalty agreements: (i) are for a term of either or ten years, renewable by the parties, and may be terminated by either party on 90 days' notice for convenience (provided that if terminated by the Company for convenience the obligation to pay royalties is not affected); (ii) confirm the irrevocable transfer to the Company of all pertinent intellectual property rights; (iii) set the applicable royalty rate; (iv) set the period of time during which royalties are payable; and (v) prohibit the payment of royalties on products sold to entities and/or individuals with whom the surgeon advisor or any other surgeon advisor entitled to royalties is affiliated. Each of the royalty agreements may be subsequently amended to add the license of additional intellectual property covering new products, and as a result, multiple royalty rates and duration of royalty payments may be included in one royalty agreement.
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company's royalty agreements provide for (i) royalty payments for 10 years from first commercial sale of the relevant product, and (ii) a royalty rate for each such agreement ranging from 0.2% to 3.0% of net sales for the particular product to which the surgeon contributed.
As of December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, the Company has royalty agreements with certain surgeon consultants. The Company recognized royalty expense for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 of $6.4 million, $6.8 million, and $6.9 million, respectively, resulting in an aggregate royalty rate of 3.0%, 3.2%, and 3.7%, respectively.
Contingencies
In accordance with applicable accounting standards, the Company establishes an accrued liability for litigation contingencies when those matters present loss contingencies that are both probable and can be reasonably estimated. The Company discloses the nature of the contingency when management believes there is at least a reasonable possibility that the outcome may be material to the Company’s financial statements and, where feasible, an estimate of the possible loss. In such cases, there still may be an exposure to loss in excess of any amounts reasonably estimated and accrued. When a loss contingency is not both probable and reasonably estimable, the Company does not establish an accrued liability, but continues to monitor, in conjunction with any outside counsel handling a matter, further developments that would make such loss contingency both probable and reasonably estimable. Once the Company establishes an accrued liability with respect to a loss contingency, the Company continues to monitor the matter for further developments that could affect the amount of the accrued liability that has been previously established, and any appropriate adjustments are made each quarter.
On April 11, 2025, a shareholder filed a class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (captioned McCluney v. Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. et al. Case No. 3:25-cv-00390-WWB-PDB) against the Company and certain of its officers on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the Company’s stock between May 8, 2023 and May 7, 2024 alleging that the Company and certain of its officers violated federal securities laws by making false or misleading statements and failing to disclose material adverse facts about the Company's business, operations and prospects. The plaintiffs seek unspecified monetary damages, costs, and attorneys’ fees. On July 1, 2025, the court appointed the lead plaintiff and lead counsel. The plaintiff filed an amended complaint on July 31, 2025, and the Company filed a motion to dismiss on September 5, 2025. The action is in the preliminary stage. The Company disputes the allegations in the complaint and intends to defend against this complaint vigorously. Based on the preliminary nature of the proceedings in this action, the outcome remains uncertain, and the Company cannot reasonably estimate the potential impact, if any, on its business or financial statements at this time. The Company is insured for Directors and Officers liability for amounts in excess of the retention and up to the policy limits.
There were no accrued contingent liabilities as of December 31, 2025 and 2024.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Feb 27, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Feb 27, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Feb 27, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Mar 8, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Mar 4, 2022 | |
About Commitments Disclosures
Commitments and contingencies disclosures catalog a company's off-balance-sheet obligations and legal exposures — purchase commitments, guarantee arrangements, pending litigation, and regulatory proceedings. These items represent potential future cash outflows that may not appear as liabilities on the balance sheet until they become probable and estimable.
Key signals: litigation reserves and disclosed loss ranges quantify management's estimate of legal exposure, but unquantified "reasonably possible" losses often represent the larger risk. Watch for changes in language around pending cases — shifts from "remote" to "reasonably possible" or increases in estimated loss ranges signal deteriorating outcomes. Unconditional purchase obligations and take-or-pay contracts create fixed cost structures that reduce operational flexibility. Guarantee arrangements for subsidiaries or joint ventures can create cascading obligations. Compare the total commitment schedule against projected free cash flow to assess whether the company can meet its obligations without additional financing.