4. Fair Value Measurements

Fair value of assets and liabilities

Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities payable within one year are carried at cost, which approximates fair value due to their short-term nature. The only financial instruments measured at fair value are short-term investments, the Notes (as defined below), and contingent consideration relating to the NetLine, Industry Dive, Canalys, Tech Research Pty Ltd and Tech Research Asia acquisitions. See Note 5. Acquisitions. The fair value of these financial assets and liabilities was determined based on three levels of input as follows:

Level 1. Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities;
Level 2. Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets; and
Level 3. Unobservable inputs.

 

As of December 31, 2025, there were no material financial instruments that are measured at fair value.

The following table presents Informa TechTarget's financial instruments that are measured at fair value as of December 31, 2024:

 



 

 

As of December 31, 2024

 





 

 

Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)

 

 

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

 

 

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

 

 

Total Fair Value Measurements

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pooled bond funds

 

$

 

 

$

77,705

 

 

$

 

 

$

77,705

 

Total short-term investments

 

$

 

 

$

77,705

 

 

$

 

 

$

77,705

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2025 Notes

 

$

 

 

$

3,030

 

 

$

 

 

$

3,030

 

2026 Notes

 

 

 

 

 

412,660

 

 

 

 

 

 

412,660

 

Total Notes

 

$

 

 

$

415,690

 

 

$

 

 

$

415,690

 

 

All level 2 investments are priced using observable inputs, such as quoted prices in markets that are not active and yield curves.

The fair value of the Notes was determined based on inputs that are observable in the market or that could be derived from, or corroborated with, observable market data, quoted price of the Notes in an over-the-counter market (Level 2).

The convertible senior notes due December 15, 2025 (the “2025 Notes”) and the convertible senior notes due December 15, 2026 (the “2026 Notes” and, together with the 2025 Notes, the “Notes”) were governed by indentures originally between Former TechTarget, as issuer, and U.S. Bank, National Association, as trustee (together, the “Indentures”). Informa TechTarget assumed all of Former TechTarget's rights and obligations under the Indentures in connection with the Merger. The Notes were unsecured and rank senior in right of payment to Informa TechTarget’s future indebtedness that is expressly subordinated in right of payment to the Notes and equal in right of payment to Informa TechTarget’s unsecured indebtedness that is not so subordinated.

The fair value of the contingent consideration for the Industry Dive acquisition was calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation approach. In determining the fair value, the contingent consideration for the Industry Dive acquisition was valued using a cost of debt rate of 5.4% and an average revenue discount rate of 7.3% as of December 31, 2023. Contingent consideration related to the acquisition of Canalys was settled in the second quarter of 2024 for $5.0 million by the Parent. Prior to the close of the Transactions, the Informa Tech Digital Businesses and the selling shareholders of Industry Dive negotiated a settlement of the Industry Dive contingent consideration for $23.7 million. As such, the contingent consideration was remeasured to the settlement value. The contingent consideration related to the Industry Dive acquisition was assumed by the Parent on the close of the Transaction.

Contingent consideration amounts for 2024 and 2023 are based on revenue growth for Industry Dive and revenue and cost performance for Canalys (Level 3 fair value measurements) and have been estimated on an acquisition-by-acquisition basis using available forecasts (a significant unobservable input). The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgement. Contingent consideration amounts for 2025 are related to the Tech Research Pty Ltd and Tech Research Asia acquisitions in the third quarter of 2025. The Company recorded $0.5 million of contingent consideration at the time of the acquisition. During the fourth quarter of 2025, the company remeasured the fair value of the contingent consideration and recorded an increase to the liability of $0.9 million.

Below is a summary of the changes in contingent consideration balances for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023:

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2025

 

 

2024

 

 

2023

 

Balance at beginning of the year

 

$

 

 

$

51,136

 

 

$

171,100

 

Acquisitions

 

 

525

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,980

 

Remeasurements

 

 

925

 

 

 

(22,436

)

 

 

(123,944

)

Settlements

 

 

 

 

 

(5,000

)

 

 

 

Transfer of Industry Dive liability to Parent

 

 

 

 

 

(23,700

)

 

 

 

Balance at end of the year

 

$

1,450

 

 

$

 

 

$

51,136

 

In the year ended December 31, 2023, Informa TechTarget made reductions to the revenue growth and adjusted EBITDA forecasts of Industry Dive, which resulted in a lower fair value of the contingent consideration. In the year ended December 31, 2024, the remeasurement gain primarily related to the renegotiation of the Industry Dive contingent consideration described above. See Note 5. Business Combination for further detail on the Industry Dive contingent consideration arrangements and Note 6. Goodwill and intangible assets for detail on the Industry Dive and Canalys reporting unit impairment.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 11, 2026Showing above
2024May 28, 2025

About Fair Value Disclosures

Fair value disclosures classify all assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three-level hierarchy: Level 1 (quoted market prices), Level 2 (observable inputs like yield curves), and Level 3 (unobservable inputs requiring management estimates). The proportion of Level 3 assets directly reflects how much of the balance sheet depends on internal models rather than market evidence.

Key signals: a growing Level 3 balance relative to total fair-value assets increases valuation uncertainty and earnings volatility risk. Watch for transfers between levels — assets moving from Level 2 to Level 3 often signal deteriorating market liquidity. Unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 positions flow through earnings or other comprehensive income, so large swings deserve scrutiny. For financial institutions, examine the sensitivity disclosures that show how Level 3 valuations change under alternative assumptions. Compare the fair value of debt against its carrying amount to gauge hidden leverage.