Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

 

In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets (ASU 2025-5). The ASU 2025 -05 relates to estimating credit losses under the calculation of current expected credit losses (CECL) for current accounts receivable and current contract assets arising from revenue transactions accounted for under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. For all entities, the ASU provides a practical expedient to assume that current conditions as of the balance sheet date will persist through the reasonable and supportable forecast period for eligible assets. Entities will still be required to adjust historical data used in the estimation to reflect current conditions. This policy election is available only if the entity elects the practical expedient. The date selected must be when or before financial statements are available to be issued. Under this accounting policy election, no credit loss would be recorded on balances that have been collected through subsequent receipts. Remaining uncollected amounts would be evaluated for credit losses using the practical expedient.  The provisions of ASU 2025-05 are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2025, and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted in both interim and annual reporting periods in which financial statements have not yet been issued or made available for issuance. The Company has elected to apply the practical expedient in its assessment of an allowance for credit losses as of December 31, 2025. 

 

In December 2023, FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (“ASU 2023-09”). The ASU focuses on income tax disclosures around effective tax rates and cash income taxes paid. ASU 2023-09 requires public business entities to disclose, on an annual basis, a rate reconciliation presented in both dollars and percentages. The guidance requires the rate reconciliation to include specific categories and provides further guidance on disaggregation of those categories based on a quantitative threshold equal to 5% or more of the amount determined by multiplying pretax income (loss) from continuing operations by the applicable statutory rate. For entities reconciling to the US statutory rate of 21%, this would generally require disclosing any reconciling items that impact the rate by 1.05% or more. ASU 2023-09 is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024 (generally, calendar year 2025) and effective for all other business entities one year later. Entities should adopt this guidance on a prospective basis, though retrospective application is permitted. The Company has applied the provisions of ASU 2023-09 these consolidated financial statements see Note 15 for our Income Tax footnote.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

                 

               ASU 2025-06, Goodwill and Other Internal-Use Software. In September 2025, the FASB issued a new accounting standard to modernize the accounting guidance for costs to develop internal use software. The new guidance amends the existing standard that refers to various stages of a software development project to align better with current software development methods, such as agile programming.  Under the new standard, entities will start capitalizing eligible costs when (1) management has authorized and committed to funding the software project, and (2) it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used to perform the function intended. In evaluating whether it is probable the project will be completed, an entity is required to consider whether there is significant uncertainty associated with the development activities of the software.  The new guidance will be effective for all entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The guidance can be applied on a fully prospective basis, a modified basis for in-process projects, or a full retrospective basis.

 

 

ASU 2024-03, Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (DISE). In November 2024, the FASB issued a new accounting standard to improve the disclosures about an entity’s expenses and address requests from investors for more detailed information about the types of expenses included in commonly presented expense captions. The new standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with retrospective application permitted. The Company is evaluating the disclosure requirements related to the new standard and its impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by FASB did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 31, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 31, 2025
2023Apr 1, 2024
2022Apr 4, 2023
2021Apr 12, 2022
2020Mar 31, 2021
2019Apr 13, 2020
2018Mar 28, 2019
2017Mar 23, 2018
2016Mar 31, 2017
2015Apr 11, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.