U-Haul Holding Co /NV/ New Standards Disclosure
Accounting Pronouncements
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures ("ASU 2023-09"), which requires disaggregated information about a reporting entity’s effective tax rate reconciliation as well as information on income tax paid. ASU 2023-09 was effective and adopted by the Company for the period beginning April 1, 2025 and the Company applied this standard prospectively. The adoption of this standard did not require an implementation adjustment and did not impact the Company's consolidated net earnings available to common stockholders or cash flow. The adoption of ASU 2023-09 resulted in incremental disclosure. See Note 15, Provision for Taxes, for the updated disclosures.
Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In March 2024, the SEC issued a final rule that requires disclosure of: (i) financial statement impacts of severe weather events and other natural conditions; (ii) a roll forward of carbon offset and renewable energy credit balances if material to the Company's plan to achieve climate-related targets or goals; and (iii) material impacts on estimates and assumptions in the financial statements. In April 2024, the SEC issued an order staying the final rule pending judicial review of consolidated challenges to the rules by the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. In March 2025, the SEC notified the Court that it was withdrawing its defense of the rules. The Court subsequently held the litigation in abeyance, pending a status report from the SEC on: (1) whether the SEC intends to review or reconsider the rules; (2) if taking no action, whether the SEC would adhere to the rules if petitions for review are denied; and (3) if not, why the SEC will not review or reconsider the rules at this time. In July 2025, the SEC provided its status report to the Court, stating that the SEC does not intend to review or reconsider the rules at this time, and declined to provide a definitive response to questions 2 or 3. The SEC further advised that given the previously expressed views of a majority of the current Commissioners, it is possible that the SEC would consider whether to replace, rescind, or modify the rules. The Company cannot determine at this time the future outcome of the litigation or future actions of the SEC.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses ("ASU 2024-03"). In January 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-01, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-30): Clarifying the Effective Date, which clarified the effective date of this standard. The standard requires the disclosure of additional information about specific expense categories in the notes to the financial statements. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. The standard allows for adoption on a prospective or retrospective basis. We are currently assessing the impact of adopting ASU 2024-03 on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) which provides public companies with a practical expedient in developing reasonable and supportable forecasts as part of estimating expected credit losses. All entities may elect a practical expedient that assumes that current conditions as of the balance sheet date do not change for the remaining life of the asset. Early adoption is permitted. The amendment is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2025, and interim periods within those annual reporting periods. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard and do not anticipate the adoption to be material to the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40) which amends Subtopic 350-40 by removing all references to prescriptive and sequential software development stages previously used to determine the timing of software cost capitalization. Instead, the new guidance establishes that
an entity should begin capitalizing software costs when both of the following conditions are met: 1) Management has authorized and committed funding for the software project. 2) It is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used for its intended functional purpose. These changes are intended to align software cost capitalization practices with a more principles-based approach, improving consistency and comparability across entities. The amendments in this update are effective for all entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual reporting period. We are currently assessing the impact of this standard on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-09, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Hedge Accounting Improvements, which provides clarification on certain topics which are meant to more closely align hedge accounting with the economics of the entities' risk management activities. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, and interim periods within those annual reporting periods. The amendment should apply on a prospective basis for all hedging relationships. An entity may elect to adopt the amendment for hedging relationships that exist as of the date of adoption. Upon adoption entities are permitted to modify certain critical terms of certain hedging relationships without de-designating the hedge. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270) Narrow-Scope Improvements, which clarifies interim disclosure requirements and the applicability of Topic 270. Topic 270 addresses required disclosures, including that entities must disclose any events that had a material impact since their last annual reporting period and clarifies types of interim reporting and the form and content of interim financial statements in accordance with GAAP. The standard is effective for interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The amendment may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively to any or all prior periods presented in the financial statements. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | May 27, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2025 | May 29, 2025 | |
| 2024 | May 30, 2024 | |
| 2023 | Jun 2, 2023 | |
| 2022 | May 25, 2022 | |
| 2021 | May 26, 2021 | |
| 2020 | May 27, 2020 | |
| 2019 | May 29, 2019 | |
| 2018 | May 30, 2018 | |
| 2017 | May 24, 2017 | |
| 2016 | May 25, 2016 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.