Wheels Up Experience Inc.UP
Wheels Up Experience Inc. Commitments Disclosure
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We have contractual obligations and commitments, primarily in the form of obligations to provide services for which we have already received deferred revenue (see Note 3), repayment of long-term debt (see Note 8), leases (see Note 10), legal proceedings, and sales and use tax liability.
Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we are subject to various legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, which arise in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, as of the date of this Annual Report we do not believe that the outcome of any of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
GRP Litigation
As of the date of this Annual Report, we have an active lawsuit against Exclusive Jets, LLC d/b/a flyExclusive, a subsidiary of flyExclusive, Inc. (“FE”), to enforce our rights and remedies for wrongful termination by FE of the Fleet Guaranteed Revenue Program Agreement, dated November 1, 2021, between WUP and FE (the “GRP Agreement”). On June 30, 2023, FE notified us in writing of its immediate termination of the GRP Agreement. We believe that FE wrongfully terminated such agreement in breach thereof. We are seeking compensatory damages, including the return of material deposits held by FE under the GRP Agreement (collectively, the “GRP Deposit”) that were recorded in Other non-current assets on the consolidated balance sheets as of each of December 31, 2025 and 2024, as well as attorneys’ fees and costs.
On July 5, 2023, we originally filed a complaint against FE to enforce our rights under the GRP Agreement in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In August 2023, we re-filed the complaint against FE in the Supreme Court of the State of New York in New York County (“NY State Court”). On December 2, 2025, the NY State Court dismissed our complaint without prejudice, citing its lack of personal jurisdiction over FE and declining to render any decision on the merits of the case. On December 23, 2025, FE’s related counterclaim in NY State Court was discontinued without prejudice.
On December 30, 2025, we re-filed the complaint to enforce our rights under the GRP Agreement against each of FE and Thomas James Segrave Jr., FE’s founder and Chief Executive Officer, as a defendant for a claim based on piercing the corporate veil, in the General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division in Wake County, North Carolina
(case #25CV047093-910) (the “NC Complaint”). The Company’s NC Complaint includes factual allegations regarding FE’s wrongful termination of the GRP Agreement and, among other things, claims for breach of contract, conversion, violations of the North Carolina Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act, fraudulent misrepresentation, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment. On January 23, 2026, we served the first set of discovery requests on FE and Mr. Segrave. On March 6, 2026, FE and Mr. Segrave filed their answer and affirmative defenses to the NC Complaint, FE asserted counterclaims for amounts it claims it is owed under the GRP Agreement, and FE filed a partial motion to dismiss certain claims on procedural grounds. The parties are actively engaged in the litigation process.
We intend to vigorously pursue the action to recover the outstanding GRP Deposit and other damages from FE and defend against any related counterclaims, but there can be no assurance as to the outcome of the dispute with FE. Our success in recovering the amounts from FE will depend on several factors, including the ability of FE to satisfy any judgment or settlement with available funds. We are in the process of evaluating the effects of the foregoing events and we cannot make a reasonable estimate of any outcome, recovery or loss at this time.
Sales and Use Tax Liability
We regularly provide services to members in various states within the U.S., which may create sales and use tax nexus via temporary presence, potentially requiring the payment of these taxes. We determined that there is uncertainty as to what constitutes nexus in respective states for a state to levy taxes, fees, and surcharges relating to our activity. As of each of December 31, 2025 and 2024, we estimated the potential exposure to such tax liability to be $5.5 million, the expense for which is included in Accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mar 10, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Mar 11, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Mar 7, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Mar 31, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Mar 10, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Mar 15, 2021 | |
About Commitments Disclosures
Commitments and contingencies disclosures catalog a company's off-balance-sheet obligations and legal exposures — purchase commitments, guarantee arrangements, pending litigation, and regulatory proceedings. These items represent potential future cash outflows that may not appear as liabilities on the balance sheet until they become probable and estimable.
Key signals: litigation reserves and disclosed loss ranges quantify management's estimate of legal exposure, but unquantified "reasonably possible" losses often represent the larger risk. Watch for changes in language around pending cases — shifts from "remote" to "reasonably possible" or increases in estimated loss ranges signal deteriorating outcomes. Unconditional purchase obligations and take-or-pay contracts create fixed cost structures that reduce operational flexibility. Guarantee arrangements for subsidiaries or joint ventures can create cascading obligations. Compare the total commitment schedule against projected free cash flow to assess whether the company can meet its obligations without additional financing.