Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No 2023-09 Income Taxes (“Topic 740”) “Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures Topic 740”, which enhances the transparency of income tax disclosures primarily related to rate reconciliation and income taxes paid information. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. This guidance is effective on a prospective basis, though retrospective application is permitted. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU No. 2023-09 at the beginning of the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2025 and applied them retrospectively. Refer to Note 18, Income Taxes for additional information. The provisions of the new standard do not materially affect our financial position, results of operation or cash flows.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No 2024-03 Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—“Expense Disaggregation Disclosures: Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses”, which requires disclosure of disaggregated information about certain income statement expense line items within the footnotes to the financial statements. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this standard will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06 Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (“Subtopic 350-40”) “Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software”, which amends the accounting guidance on the timing of capitalization of internally-developed software costs by removing references to software development stages, and provides guidance on how to determine when it is probable that a project will be completed and a software will be used to perform the function intended. This guidance is effective for interim and fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The standard updates may be applied prospectively, retrospectively, or via a modified prospective transition method. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this standard will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (“Subtopic 326”) “Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets”. This update provides a practical expedient for all entities to simplify the estimation of expected credit losses for current accounts receivable and current contract assets arising from transactions accounted for under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. In developing reasonable and supportable forecasts as part of estimating expected credit losses, entities may elect a practical expedient that assumes that current conditions as of the balance sheet date do not change for the remaining life of the asset. The standard updates should be applied on a prospective basis. This guidance is effective for interim and fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this standard will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements but does not expect the provisions of the new standard to materially affect our financial position, results of operation or cash flows.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 12, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 13, 2025
2023Feb 15, 2024
2022Feb 17, 2022
2021Feb 16, 2021
2019Feb 13, 2020
2018Feb 14, 2019
2017Feb 27, 2018

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.