Recently Issued But Not Yet Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

 

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement–Reporting Comprehensive Income–Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expense (“ASU 2027-03”), effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The amendments in this update require disclosure, in the notes to the financial statements, of specified information about certain costs and expenses and a qualitative description of the amounts remaining in relevant expense captions that are not separately disaggregated quantitatively. The company is currently evaluating the potential impact the adoption of ASU 2024-03 will have on its future disclosures.

 

ASU 2025-05: Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets was issued in July 2025 and allows entities to elect a practical expedient that assumes that the current conditions as of the balance sheet date do not change for the remaining life of the asset. ASU No. 2025-05 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2025, is to be applied on a prospective basis and allows for early adoption. Adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

 

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 27, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 20, 2025
2023Mar 27, 2024
2022Mar 30, 2023
2021Mar 31, 2022

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.