COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Capital Commitments - Fleet
The Company’s unfunded capital commitments as of December 31, 2025, consisted primarily of agreements to purchase helicopters and totaled $104.4 million, payable beginning in 2026.
Included in these commitments are orders to purchase seven AW189 heavy helicopters, scheduled to be delivered in 2026, and deposits for preferred aircraft delivery slots on five EL9 aircraft scheduled for delivery between 2029 and 2030 (subject to aircraft certification). In addition, the Company has outstanding options to purchase up to ten additional AW189 helicopters and nine additional H135 helicopters. If these options are exercised, the AW189 helicopters and the H135 helicopters would be scheduled for delivery between 2027 and 2028. The Company may, from time to time, purchase aircraft for which it has no orders. Orders to purchase electric vertical takeoff and landing and short takeoff and landing aircraft, collectively known as Advanced Air Mobility (“AAM”) aircraft are subject to, among other things, deadlines for regulatory certification of such aircraft and minimum performance requirements, and failure to satisfy such deadlines or requirements would allow such orders to be terminated by the Company without further liability and require the applicable manufacturer to refund certain deposits to the Company. In addition, the Company has outstanding options for several AAM aircraft models with various OEMs that do not involve financial commitments at this time.
General Litigation and Disputes
The Company operates in jurisdictions internationally where it is subject to risks that include government action to obtain additional tax revenues. In a number of these jurisdictions, political unrest, the lack of well-developed legal systems and legislation that is not clear enough in its wording to determine the ultimate application, can make it difficult to determine whether legislation may impact the Company’s earnings until such time as a clear court or other ruling exists. The Company operates in jurisdictions currently where amounts may be due to governmental bodies for which the Company is not currently recording liabilities for as it is unclear how broad or narrow legislation may ultimately be interpreted. The Company believes that payment of amounts in these instances is not probable at this time, but is reasonably possible.
In the normal course of business, the Company is involved in various litigation matters including, among other things, claims by third parties for alleged property damages and personal injuries. Management has used estimates in determining the Company’s potential exposure to these matters and has recorded reserves in its consolidated financial statements related thereto as appropriate. It is possible that a change in its estimates related to these exposures could occur, but the Company does not expect such changes in estimated costs or uninsured losses, if any, would have a material effect on its business, consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 26, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 27, 2025
2023Mar 6, 2024
2022May 31, 2022
2021May 27, 2021
2019Mar 6, 2020
2018Mar 8, 2019
2017Mar 9, 2018
2016Mar 9, 2017
2015Feb 26, 2016

About Commitments Disclosures

Commitments and contingencies disclosures catalog a company's off-balance-sheet obligations and legal exposures — purchase commitments, guarantee arrangements, pending litigation, and regulatory proceedings. These items represent potential future cash outflows that may not appear as liabilities on the balance sheet until they become probable and estimable.

Key signals: litigation reserves and disclosed loss ranges quantify management's estimate of legal exposure, but unquantified "reasonably possible" losses often represent the larger risk. Watch for changes in language around pending cases — shifts from "remote" to "reasonably possible" or increases in estimated loss ranges signal deteriorating outcomes. Unconditional purchase obligations and take-or-pay contracts create fixed cost structures that reduce operational flexibility. Guarantee arrangements for subsidiaries or joint ventures can create cascading obligations. Compare the total commitment schedule against projected free cash flow to assess whether the company can meet its obligations without additional financing.