Fair Value
Fair value estimates are dependent upon subjective assumptions and involve significant uncertainties resulting in variability in estimates with changes in assumptions. The following table summarizes the principal amounts, carrying values and the estimated fair values of our financial instruments ($ in thousands):
December 31, 2025December 31, 2024
Principal /
Notional Amount
Carrying
Value
Estimated
Fair Value
Principal /
Notional Amount
Carrying
Value
Estimated
Fair Value
Financial assets:
Loans and investments, net$12,113,107 $11,934,248 $11,964,280 $11,304,956 $11,033,997 $11,122,205 
Loans held-for-sale, net408,386 409,081 421,398 438,233 435,759 449,339 
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights, netn/a340,842 474,767 n/a368,678 511,282 
Securities held-to-maturity, net229,521 156,087 150,147 230,012 157,154 144,508 
Derivative financial instruments94,319 585 585 41,724 95 95 
Financial liabilities:
Credit and repurchase facilities$5,161,707 $5,149,651 $5,143,472 $3,568,361 $3,559,490 $3,592,120 
Securitized debt3,485,786 3,468,258 3,487,773 4,632,015 4,622,489 4,616,409 
Senior unsecured notes2,050,000 2,029,078 2,009,938 1,245,000 1,236,147 1,160,154 
Convertible senior unsecured notes— — — 287,500 285,853 287,500 
Junior subordinated notes154,336 145,497 111,992 154,336 144,686 109,099 
Notes payable - real estate owned222,965 222,965 221,893 74,897 74,897 74,495 
Derivative financial instruments292,734 1,082 1,082 354,300 4,209 4,209 
Assets and liabilities disclosed at fair value are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Determining which category an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy requires judgment and we evaluate our hierarchy disclosures each quarter. Hierarchical levels directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these assets and liabilities are as follows:
Level 1 —Inputs are unadjusted and quoted prices exist in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, such as government, agency and equity securities.
Level 2—Inputs (other than quoted prices included in Level 1) are observable for the asset or liability through correlation with market data. Level 2 inputs may include quoted market prices for a similar asset or liability, interest rates and credit risk. Examples include non-government securities, certain mortgage and asset-backed securities, certain corporate debt and certain derivative instruments.
Level 3—Inputs reflect our best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability and are based on significant unobservable inputs that require a considerable amount of judgment and assumptions. Examples include certain mortgage and asset-backed securities, certain corporate debt and certain derivative instruments.
The following is a description of the valuation techniques used to measure fair value and the general classification of these instruments pursuant to the fair value hierarchy.
Loans and investments, net. Fair values of loans and investments that are not impaired are estimated using inputs based on direct capitalization rate and discounted cash flow methodology using discount rates, which, in our opinion, best reflect current market interest rates that would be offered for loans with similar characteristics and credit quality (Level 3). Fair values of impaired loans and investments are estimated using inputs that require significant judgments, which include assumptions regarding discount rates, capitalization rates, creditworthiness of major tenants, occupancy rates, availability of financing, exit plans and other factors (Level 3).
Loans held-for-sale, net. Consists of originated loans that are generally expected to be transferred or sold within 60 days to 180 days of loan funding, and are valued using pricing models that incorporate observable inputs from current market assumptions or a hypothetical
securitization model utilizing observable market data from recent securitization spreads and observable pricing of loans with similar characteristics (Level 2). Fair value includes the fair value allocated to the associated future MSRs and is calculated pursuant to the valuation techniques described below for capitalized mortgage servicing rights, net (Level 3).
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights, net. Fair values are estimated using inputs based on discounted future net cash flow methodology (Level 3). MSRs are initially recorded at fair value and are carried at amortized cost. The fair value of MSRs is estimated using a process that involves the use of independent third-party valuation experts, supported by commercially available discounted cash flow models and analysis of current market data. The key inputs used in estimating fair value include the discount rate and contractually specified servicing fees, and to a lessor extent the prepayment speed of the underlying loans, annual per loan cost to service loans, delinquency rates, late charges and other economic factors.
Securities held-to-maturity, net. Fair values are approximated using inputs based on current market quotes received from financial sources that trade such securities and are based on prevailing market data and, in some cases, are derived from third-party proprietary models based on well recognized financial principles and reasonable estimates about relevant future market conditions (Level 3).
Derivative financial instruments. Fair values of rate lock and forward sale commitments are estimated using valuation techniques, which include internally-developed models based on changes in the U.S. Treasury rate and other observable market data (Level 2). The fair value of rate lock commitments includes the fair value of the expected net cash flows associated with the servicing of the loans, see capitalized mortgage servicing rights, net above for details on the applicable valuation technique (Level 3). We also consider the impact of counterparty non-performance risk when measuring the fair value of these derivatives.
Credit facilities, repurchase facilities, and notes payable - real estate owned. Fair values for credit and repurchase facilities and notes payable - real estate owned of the Structured Business are estimated using discounted cash flow methodology, using discount rates, which, in our opinion, best reflect current market interest rates for financing with similar characteristics and credit quality (Level 3). The majority of our credit and repurchase facilities for the Agency Business bear interest at rates that are similar to those available in the market currently and fair values are estimated using Level 2 inputs. For these facilities, the fair values approximate their carrying values.
Securitized debt and junior subordinated notes. Fair values are estimated based on broker quotations, representing the discounted expected future cash flows at a yield that reflects current market interest rates and credit spreads (Level 3).
Senior unsecured notes. Fair values are estimated at current market quotes received from active markets when available (Level 1). If quotes from active markets are unavailable, then the fair values are estimated utilizing current market quotes received from inactive markets (Level 2).
Convertible senior unsecured notes. Fair values are estimated using current market quotes received from inactive markets (Level 2).
We measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair values of these financial assets and liabilities are determined using the following input levels at December 31, 2025 ($ in thousands):
Carrying ValueFair ValueFair Value Measurements Using Fair Value Hierarchy
Level 1Level 2Level 3
Financial assets:
Derivative financial instruments$585 $585 $— $112 $473 
Financial liabilities:
Derivative financial instruments$1,082 $1,082 $— $1,082 $— 
We measure certain financial and non-financial assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. The fair values of these financial and non-financial assets, if applicable, were determined using the following input levels at December 31, 2025 ($ in thousands):
Fair Value Measurements Using Fair Value Hierarchy
Net Carrying ValueFair ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Financial assets:
Impaired loans, net
Loans held-for-investment (1)$339,100 $339,100 $— $— $339,100 
Loans held-for-sale (2)12,989 12,989 — 12,989 — 
$352,089 $352,089 $— $12,989 $339,100 
________________________________________
(1)We had an allowance for credit losses of $43.1 million relating to 20 impaired loans with an aggregate carrying value, before loan loss reserves, of $382.2 million at December 31, 2025. The fair values of these impaired loans are based on the value of the underlying collateral.
(2)We have an impairment of $1.0 million related to three loans held-for-sale with an aggregate carrying value, before unrealized impairment losses, of $14.0 million.
Loan impairment assessments. Loans held-for-investment are intended to be held to maturity and, accordingly, are carried at cost, net of unamortized loan origination costs and fees, loan purchase discounts, and net of allowance for credit losses, when such loan or investment is deemed to be impaired. We consider a loan impaired when, based upon current information, it is probable that all amounts due for both principal and interest will not be collected according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. We evaluate our loans to determine if the value of the underlying collateral securing the impaired loan is less than the net carrying value of the loan, which may result in an allowance, and corresponding charge to the provision for credit losses, or an impairment loss. These valuations require significant judgments, which include assumptions regarding capitalization and discount rates, revenue growth rates, creditworthiness of major tenants, occupancy rates, availability of financing, exit plan and other factors.
Loans held-for-sale are generally expected to be transferred or sold within 60 days to 180 days of loan origination and are reported at lower of cost or market. We consider a loan classified as held-for-sale impaired if, based on current information, it is probable that we will sell the loan below par, or not be able to collect all principal and interest in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. These loans are valued using pricing models that incorporate observable inputs from current market assumptions or a hypothetical securitization model utilizing observable market data from recent securitization spreads and observable pricing of loans with similar characteristics.
The tables above and below include all impaired loans, regardless of the period in which the impairment was recognized.
Quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements at December 31, 2025 is as follows ($ in thousands):
Fair ValueValuation TechniquesSignificant Unobservable Inputs
Financial assets:
Impaired loans:Weighted AverageMinimum / Maximum
Multifamily$302,297 Discounted cash flowsCapitalization rate5.92%
5.50% - 7.00%
22,851 Price quotesN/AN/AN/A
$325,148 
Retail$13,952 Sales comparativePrice per acre$165$165
Derivative financial instruments:
Rate lock commitments$473 Discounted cash flowsW/A discount rate13.87%13.87%
The derivative financial instruments using Level 3 inputs are outstanding for short periods of time (generally less than 60 days). A roll-forward of Level 3 derivative instruments is as follows ($ in thousands):
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs
for the Year Ended December 31,
202520242023
Derivative assets and liabilities, net
Beginning balance$— $428 $354 
Settlements(54,059)(50,492)(66,407)
Realized gains recorded in earnings54,059 50,064 66,053 
Unrealized gains recorded in earnings473 — 428 
Ending balance$473 $— $428 
The components of fair value and other relevant information associated with our forward sales commitments and the estimated fair value of cash flows from servicing on loans held-for-sale are as follows ($ in thousands):
December 31, 2025Notional/
Principal Amount
Fair Value of
Servicing Rights
Unrealized
Impairment Loss
Total Fair Value
Adjustment
Rate lock commitments$29,621 $473 $— $473 
Forward sale commitments357,432 — — — 
Loans held-for-sale, net (1)408,386 5,921 1,414 7,335 
Total$6,394 $1,414 $7,808 
________________________________________
(1)Loans held-for-sale, net are recorded at the lower of cost or market on an aggregate basis and includes fair value adjustments related to estimated cash flows from MSRs.
We measure certain assets and liabilities for which fair value is only disclosed. The fair values of these assets and liabilities are determined using the following input levels at December 31, 2025 ($ in thousands):
Fair Value Measurements Using Fair Value Hierarchy
Carrying ValueFair ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Financial assets:
Loans and investments, net$11,934,248 $11,964,280 $— $— $11,964,280 
Loans held-for-sale, net409,081 421,398 — 415,477 5,921 
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights, net340,842 474,767 — — 474,767 
Securities held-to-maturity, net156,087 150,147 — — 150,147 
Financial liabilities:
Credit and repurchase facilities$5,149,651 $5,143,472 $— $390,396 $4,753,076 
Securitized debt3,468,258 3,487,773 — — 3,487,773 
Senior unsecured notes2,029,078 2,009,938 2,009,938 — — 
Junior subordinated notes145,497 111,992 — — 111,992 
Notes payable - real estate owned222,965 221,893 — — 221,893 

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 27, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 21, 2025
2023Feb 20, 2024
2022Feb 17, 2023
2021Feb 18, 2022
2020Feb 19, 2021
2019Feb 14, 2020
2018Feb 15, 2019
2017Feb 23, 2018
2016Mar 3, 2017
2015Feb 26, 2016

About Fair Value Disclosures

Fair value disclosures classify all assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three-level hierarchy: Level 1 (quoted market prices), Level 2 (observable inputs like yield curves), and Level 3 (unobservable inputs requiring management estimates). The proportion of Level 3 assets directly reflects how much of the balance sheet depends on internal models rather than market evidence.

Key signals: a growing Level 3 balance relative to total fair-value assets increases valuation uncertainty and earnings volatility risk. Watch for transfers between levels — assets moving from Level 2 to Level 3 often signal deteriorating market liquidity. Unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 positions flow through earnings or other comprehensive income, so large swings deserve scrutiny. For financial institutions, examine the sensitivity disclosures that show how Level 3 valuations change under alternative assumptions. Compare the fair value of debt against its carrying amount to gauge hidden leverage.