Recently Issued Accounting Standards Adopted
The Company adopted ASU 2023-09, “Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures,” which was issued in December 2023 with the stated purpose of enhancing the transparency and decision usefulness of income tax disclosures. The amendments in ASU 2023-09 address investor requests for enhanced income tax information primarily through changes to the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid information. The Company adopted this ASU on a prospective basis. The adoption of this ASU did not have any effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
ASU 2024-03, “Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses” was issued in November 2024, which requires disaggregated disclosure of income statement expenses for public business entities. The ASU does not change the expense captions an entity presents on the face of the income statement; rather, it requires disaggregation of certain expense captions into specified categories in disclosures within the footnotes to the financial statements. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The requirements will be applied prospectively with the option for retrospective application. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
ASU 2025-06, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal- Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software,” was issued in September 2025. The new guidance amends the accounting for the internal-use software by eliminating references to software development project stages. Under the revised standard, entities must capitalize software costs when (i) management has authorized and committed funding for the project, and (ii) it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will function as intended. The update also clarifies that both internal and external training costs, as well as maintenance costs, must be expensed as incurred. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027 and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. The requirements may be applied prospectively, with options for modified retrospective or full retrospective application. The Company plans to early adopt this ASU on a prospective basis beginning January 1, 2026, consistent with the permitted early adoption rules. The Company does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
ASU 2025-10, “Accounting for Government Grants Received by Business Entities”, was issued in December 2025. The ASU establishes authoritative guidance for the recognition, measurement, and presentation of government grants. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public business entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2028, and interim periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 26, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 27, 2025
2023Feb 23, 2024
2022Feb 24, 2023
2021Feb 25, 2022
2020Feb 26, 2021
2019Feb 28, 2020
2017Feb 28, 2018
2016Mar 1, 2017

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.