APARTMENT INVESTMENT & MANAGEMENT CO New Standards Disclosure
Recent accounting pronouncements
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, “Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses”, which requires disaggregated disclosure of income statement expenses. The ASU does not change the expense captions an entity presents on the face of the income statement. Rather, it requires disclosure in a tabular format of the disaggregation of any relevant expense caption presented on the face of the income statement within continuing operations into the following required natural expense categories, as applicable: (1) purchases of inventory, (2) employee compensation, (3) depreciation, (4) intangible asset amortization, and (5) depletion. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. ASU 2024-03 should be applied on a prospective basis, while retrospective application is permitted. Management has determined this accounting pronouncement will not have a material effect on our financial statements due to the expected change to liquidation basis of accounting upon stockholder approval of the Plan of Sale and Liquidation.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mar 2, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Feb 24, 2025 | |
| 2019 | Feb 24, 2020 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.