APARTMENT INVESTMENT & MANAGEMENT CO Fair Value Disclosure
Note 12 — Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
In determining the fair value of our financial instruments, we apply ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures”. Fair value hierarchy under ASC 820 distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (Levels 1 and 2) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant data (Level 3). Fair value estimates may differ from the amounts that may ultimately be realized upon sale or disposition of the assets and liabilities.
From time to time, we purchase interest rate swaps, caps, and other instruments to provide protection against increases in interest rates on our variable rate debt. These instruments are presented as Interest rate contracts in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2025, we held interest rate caps with a maximum notional value of $289.0 million. These instruments were acquired for $0.5 million. The fair value of these instruments are noted in the table below.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, we monetized the $1.5 billion notional amount interest rate swaption, purchased in conjunction with the Mezzanine Investment to protect against future interest rate increases, for gross proceeds of $54.2 million.
On a recurring basis, we measure at fair value our interest rate contracts. Our interest rate contracts are classified within Level 2 of the GAAP fair value hierarchy, and we estimate their fair value using pricing models that rely on observable market information, including contractual terms, market prices, and interest rate yield curves. The fair value adjustment is included in earnings in Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on interest rate contracts in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Changes in fair value are reflected as a non-cash transaction in adjustments to arrive at cash flows from operations, any upfront premium is reflected in Purchase of interest rate contracts, and any proceeds are reflected in Proceeds from interest rate contracts in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
During the year ended December 31, 2025, we sold our investment in stock, historically measured at fair value. As of December 31, 2024, we had investments in stock of $1.6 million classified within Level 1 of the GAAP fair value hierarchy. In addition, as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, we had investments in property technology funds of $4.9 million and $3.5 million, respectively, in entities that develop technology related to the real estate industry. These investments are measured at net asset value (“NAV”) as a practical expedient. The period of time over which the underlying assets in these investments are expected to be liquidated is unknown. See Note 13 for further information regarding unfunded commitments related to these investments.
The following table summarizes the fair value of our interest rate contracts, investments in stock, and our investments in real estate technology funds as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):
|
|
As of December 31, 2025 |
|
|
As of December 31, 2024 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
||||||||
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
862 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
862 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Investments in stock |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,573 |
|
|
|
1,573 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Investments in real estate technology funds (1) |
|
|
4,924 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,468 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,956 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
5,903 |
|
|
$ |
1,573 |
|
|
$ |
862 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
(1) Investments measured at fair value using the NAV practical expedient are not classified in the fair value hierarchy.
Fair Value Disclosures
We believe that the carrying value of the consolidated amounts of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash approximated their fair value as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and are categorized within Level 1 of the GAAP fair value hierarchy. We believe that the carrying value of the consolidated amounts of notes receivable approximated their fair value as of December 31, 2025 and are categorized within Level 2 of the GAAP fair value hierarchy based on the significance of certain of the observable inputs used to estimate their fair value. We estimate the fair value of our debt using an income and market approach, including comparison of the contractual terms to observable and unobservable inputs such as market interest rate risk spreads, contractual interest rates, remaining periods to maturity, debt service coverage ratios, and loan to value ratios. We classify the fair value of our non-recourse property debt and non-recourse construction loans within Level 2 of the GAAP fair value hierarchy based on the significance of certain of the observable inputs used to estimate their fair value.
The following table summarizes carrying value and fair value of our non-recourse property debt and non-recourse construction loans as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):
|
|
As of December 31, 2025 |
|
|
As of December 31, 2024 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
||||
Non-recourse property debt |
|
$ |
341,796 |
|
|
$ |
332,487 |
|
|
$ |
447,955 |
|
|
$ |
419,626 |
|
Non-recourse construction loans |
|
|
404,824 |
|
|
|
408,568 |
|
|
|
393,750 |
|
|
|
393,756 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
746,620 |
|
|
$ |
741,055 |
|
|
$ |
841,705 |
|
|
$ |
813,382 |
|
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements
Real Estate
During the year ended December 31, 2025, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $147.5 million related to properties located in Colorado's Front Range and Southeast Florida. Of this, approximately $87.3 million relates to the write-off of planning costs and amounts capitalized for GAAP, such as team time and interest expense for development pipeline assets for which development will not be pursued by us given our Plan of Sale and Liquidation. We used a third-party appraisal, broker opinions of value, or letter of intent to determine the fair value estimates of the properties. The fair value estimates of the properties were determined by discounted cash flow analyses or references to market comparable data.
The cash flows utilized in such discounted cash flow analysis are comprised of projected operating results, which are based upon market conditions and future expectations. The most significant unobservable inputs utilized in determining the fair value are capitalization rates and discount rates, which were 8% and 10%, respectively. Because of these inputs, we have determined that the fair value of properties using this approach are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Market comparable data utilizes comparable sales, which are subject to judgment as to comparability to the valued properties. Because these inputs are derived from observable market data, we determined that the fair values of properties using this approach are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Investment in IQHQ
During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we performed a qualitative impairment assessment on our passive equity investment in IQHQ and recorded non-cash impairment charges of $6.6 million and $48.6 million, respectively. The valuations of IQHQ to determine the fair values as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, incorporated fair value estimates of properties owned by IQHQ. The fair value estimates of the properties owned by IQHQ were determined by discounted cash flow analyses and references to market comparable data. The cash flows utilized in such discounted cash flow analyses are comprised of projected operating results, which are based upon market conditions and future expectations. The most significant unobservable inputs utilized in determining the fair value of these assets are capitalization rates and discount rates, which ranged from 5.75% to 8.23% and 7.25% to 9.00%, respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2025 and 6.00% to 7.00% and 7.25% to 10.25%, respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2024. Because of these inputs, we have determined that the fair value of these properties are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Market comparable data utilizes comparable sales, which are subject to judgment as to comparability to the valued properties. Because these inputs are derived from observable market data, we have determined that the fair values of these properties are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Mezzanine Investment
During the year ended December 31, 2023, we tested the Mezzanine Investment for impairment given triggering events that occurred and we recorded non-cash impairment charges to reduce the carrying value of the Mezzanine Investment to zero. We used internally developed models to determine the fair value of the Mezzanine Investment. This incorporated the fair value of the underlying real estate collateral that incorporates various estimates and assumptions, the most significant being the capitalization rate of 5.25% as of December 31, 2023. These assumptions are based on Level 3 inputs.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mar 2, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Feb 24, 2025 | |
| 2019 | Feb 24, 2020 | |
About Fair Value Disclosures
Fair value disclosures classify all assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three-level hierarchy: Level 1 (quoted market prices), Level 2 (observable inputs like yield curves), and Level 3 (unobservable inputs requiring management estimates). The proportion of Level 3 assets directly reflects how much of the balance sheet depends on internal models rather than market evidence.
Key signals: a growing Level 3 balance relative to total fair-value assets increases valuation uncertainty and earnings volatility risk. Watch for transfers between levels — assets moving from Level 2 to Level 3 often signal deteriorating market liquidity. Unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 positions flow through earnings or other comprehensive income, so large swings deserve scrutiny. For financial institutions, examine the sensitivity disclosures that show how Level 3 valuations change under alternative assumptions. Compare the fair value of debt against its carrying amount to gauge hidden leverage.