Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Changes to GAAP are established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) in the form of ASUs to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The Company considers the applicability and impact of all ASUs.
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
The table below describes the impacts of the ASUs adopted by the Company, effective December 31, 2025:
Standard
Summary of the Standard
Effective Date
Method of Adoption
Impact of the Standard on the Company’s Financial Statements
ASU 2023-09 Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures

The guidance improves the transparency of income tax disclosures by requiring (1) consistent categories and greater disaggregation of information in the rate reconciliation and (2) income taxes paid disaggregated by jurisdiction. It also includes certain other amendments to improve the effectiveness of income tax disclosures.


The Company adopted the standard prospectively as of December 31, 2025.
The amended income taxes disclosures is presented in Note 11.
Future Adoption of Accounting Pronouncements
ASUs issued but not yet adopted as of December 31, 2025, that are currently being assessed and may or may not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or disclosures are included below. ASUs not listed below were assessed and either determined to be not applicable or are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
Standard
Summary of the Standard
Effective Date
Method of Adoption
Impact of the Standard on the Company’s Financial Statements
ASU 2024-03 Income
Statement—Reporting
Comprehensive Income— Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses
The guidance improves disclosures of specified information about certain costs and expenses for each interim and annual reporting period. The new disclosure requirements include:
Disclose the amounts of (a) purchases of inventory; (b) employee compensation; (c) depreciation; (d) intangible asset amortization; and (e) depreciation, depletion, and amortization recognized as part of oil- and gas-producing activities (or other amounts of depletion expense) included in each relevant expense caption.
Include certain amounts that are already required to be disclosed under current GAAP in the same disclosure as the other disaggregation requirements.
Disclose a qualitative description of the amounts remaining in relevant expense captions that are not separately disaggregated quantitatively.
Disclose the total amount of selling expenses and, in annual reporting periods, an entity’s definition of selling expenses.
December 31, 2027 and for interim periods thereafter

The Company is assessing the impact of adopting this standard as of December 31, 2027. The amended guidance is expected to have no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and to expand the annual and interim disclosures of disaggregation of relevant expense captions in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 19, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 20, 2025
2023Feb 15, 2024
2022Feb 17, 2023
2021Feb 22, 2022
2020Feb 19, 2021
2019Feb 19, 2020
2018Feb 22, 2019
2017Feb 14, 2018
2016Feb 14, 2017
2015Feb 16, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.