Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Adopted by the Company
ASU No. 2023-09— Income Taxes (Topic 740)— Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures

In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2023-09, which includes amendments to ASC 740 that further enhance income tax disclosures, primarily through standardization and disaggregation of rate reconciliation categories and income taxes paid by jurisdiction. The Company adopted ASU 2023-09 for the year ended December 31, 2025 on a prospective basis. See “Note 13—Income Taxes” for additional information on the impact to the Company.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted by the Company
ASU No. 2024-03— Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income— Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40)— Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, which is intended to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information about expenses of a public business entity, primarily through enhanced disclosures of certain components of expenses commonly presented within captions on the statement of operations, such as purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation and amortization, as well as a qualitative description of the amounts remaining in relevant expense captions that are not separately disaggregated quantitatively. ASU No. 2024-03 also requires disclosure of the total amount of selling expenses and, in annual reporting periods, the definition of selling expenses. ASU No. 2024-03 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026 and for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted and ASU No. 2024-03 may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively. The Company is currently assessing ASU No. 2024-03 and its impact on its disclosures, and the timing and method of adoption. ASU No. 2024-03 does not affect the Company's results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
ASU No. 2025-06, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other — Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40) - Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-06 to clarify and modernize the accounting for costs related to internal-use software by removing all references to software development project stages so that the guidance is neutral to different software development methods. The guidance is effective for annual filings for the Company's year beginning January 1, 2028, and interim reporting periods within those reporting periods, and can be applied using a prospective, retrospective, or modified transition approach. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the updates to ASU 2025-06 on its consolidated financial statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 20, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 28, 2025
2023Feb 29, 2024
2022Mar 1, 2023
2021Mar 1, 2022
2020Feb 16, 2021
2019Feb 28, 2020
2018Mar 1, 2019
2017Mar 14, 2018

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.