New Accounting Pronouncements

Income Taxes – In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued a new standard to improve income tax disclosures. The guidance requires disclosure of disaggregated income taxes paid, prescribes standardized categories for the components of the effective tax rate reconciliation, and modifies other income tax-related disclosures. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning January 1, 2025, with early adoption permitted. The Company has adopted this standard for its consolidated financial statements.

New Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

Expense Disaggregation Disclosures In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, which requires additional disclosure of the nature of expenses included in the income statement. The standard requires disclosures about specific types of expenses included in the expense captions presented in the income statement. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The requirements should be applied on a prospective basis while retrospective application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on its disclosures.

Derivatives and Hedging – In December 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-05, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Improvements to Hedge Accounting and Disclosure Requirements, which enhances transparency around an entity’s hedging activities. The standard expands existing disclosure requirements related to an entity’s risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking hedging activities, the effects of hedging instruments on the financial statements, and the presentation of gains and losses associated with derivatives and hedged items. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The amendments are required to be applied on a prospective basis, with certain disclosures permitted to be applied retrospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on its disclosures.

Credit Losses – In May 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets, which provides optional practical expedients to simplify the estimation of expected credit losses on certain financial assets. The amendments modify the CECL model by introducing streamlined approaches for determining expected credit losses on current accounts receivable and contract assets, along with related enhancements to required disclosures about credit risk and the measurement of expected credit losses. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The practical expedients and disclosure enhancements are required to be applied prospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 25, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 26, 2025
2023Feb 27, 2024
2022Feb 28, 2023
2021Feb 25, 2022

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.