AXT INC New Standards Disclosure
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2023-09— Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, to help investors better understand an entity’s exposure to potential changes in jurisdictional tax legislation and the ensuing risks and opportunities. Furthermore, the Update improves to assess income tax information that affects cash flow forecasts and capital allocation decisions. The Update is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024, on a prospective basis. Adoption of the new standard had an immaterial effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2024, FASB released ASU 2024-01— Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718). The update adds an illustrative example aimed at clarifying the scope application of a profit interest award in accordance with Topic 718. The update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024, and interim periods within those annual periods. Adoption of the new standard had an immaterial effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2024, FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40), which requires public business entities to disclose additional information on specific expense categories in the notes to the financial statements. The Update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Adoption is expected to have an immaterial effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In July 2025, FASB issued ASU 2025-05, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets, which allows a practical expedient that assumes current conditions as of the balance sheet date do not change for the remaining life of the asset when developing forecasts for estimating expected credit losses. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025, and interim periods within those fiscal years on a prospective basis. Adoption is expected to have an immaterial effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
In December 2025, FASB issued ASU 2025-10, Financial Instruments - Government Grants (Topic 832): Accounting for Government Grants Received by Business Entities, which establishes authoritative guidance on the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of government grants received by business entities. The Update provides a framework for determining when a grant should be recognized in income and includes enhanced disclosure requirements. The Update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2028, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Adoption is expected to have an immaterial effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mar 17, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Mar 14, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Mar 15, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Mar 16, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Mar 15, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Mar 23, 2021 | |
| 2019 | Mar 12, 2020 | |
| 2018 | Mar 11, 2019 | |
| 2017 | Mar 9, 2018 | |
| 2016 | Feb 27, 2017 | |
| 2015 | Mar 11, 2016 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.