Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvement to Income Tax Disclosures (“ASU 2023-09”), which amends income tax disclosure requirements for the effective tax rate reconciliation to include incremental income tax information and expanded disclosures of income taxes paid. We adopted ASU 2023-09 for the year ended December 31, 2025 on a prospective basis. Refer to Note 10 “Income Taxes” for additional information.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (“ASU 2024-03”). ASU 2024-03 requires public business entities to disclose more detailed information about the types of expense in commonly presented expense captions to provide investors with more transparent and detailed expense information. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026 on a prospective basis. Early adoption and retrospective application of the amendments are permitted. The Company is within the scope of this ASU and expects to adopt ASU 2024-03 on January 1, 2027, with adoption resulting in new disclosures as prescribed by the guidance.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 23, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 24, 2025
2023Feb 23, 2024
2022Feb 27, 2023

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.