14. Fair Value

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are based on one or more of the following three valuation techniques:

A.
Market approach: Prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.
B.
Cost approach: Amount that would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost).
C.
Income approach: Techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount based upon market expectations (including present value techniques, option-pricing, and excess earnings models).

 

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The financial assets or liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis are set forth in the table below (in thousands):

 

 

 

December 31, 2025

 

 

December 31, 2024

 

 

Valuation Technique

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Interest rate swaps (Level 2)

 

$

1,181

 

 

$

10,633

 

 

A

Total assets

 

$

1,181

 

 

$

10,633

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Interest rate swaps (Level 2)

 

$

1,561

 

 

$

 

 

A

   Contingent consideration (Level 3)

 

 

750

 

 

 

8,386

 

 

C

Total liabilities

 

$

2,311

 

 

$

8,386

 

 

 

The fair values of our interest rate swaps are based upon Level 2 inputs, which include valuation models. The key inputs for the valuation models are quoted market prices, interest rates, forward yield curves, and credit risk adjustments that are necessary to reflect the probability of default by the counterparty or us. For disclosures about the fair value measurements of our derivative instruments, refer to Note 6.

The contingent consideration represents future earn-outs and a post-closing equity adjustment feature, both associated with acquisitions, which are recognized as part of the purchase price at the estimated fair value on the acquisition date. These liabilities are classified as accrued expenses and long-term liabilities in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

The fair values of the liabilities associated with future earn outs were derived using the income approach with unobservable inputs, which included future earnings forecasts and present value assumptions, and there was little or no market data (Level 3). The Company will re-assess the fair values at each reporting period thereafter until settlement.

The preliminary fair value of the liability associated with the post-closing equity adjustment feature related to the Haven Hospice acquisition was derived with unobservable inputs using a Monte Carlo simulation, where the common stock price of the Company was evolved using a Geometric Brownian Motion over a period from the valuation date to the end of the fourth anniversary of closing. Estimated equity volatility was based on historical volatility, implied volatility, and peer group volatility over various periods. The Company will re-assess the fair value at each reporting period with changes in value being recorded through the consolidated statements of operations. The ultimate settlement of the liability will be through either issuance of additional equity shares and/or additional cash paid in the case of net realized losses on sales; or reduction of the outstanding balance of the seller note, in the case of net aggregate realized gain on sales up to the amounts previously paid.

The following table summarizes the changes in fair value of the Company’s contingent consideration (in thousands):

 

Balance at January 1, 2024

 

$

5,331

 

Additions of acquisition earn-out

 

 

200

 

Addition of post-closing equity adjustment feature

 

 

4,750

 

Contingent consideration payments

 

 

(4,156

)

Change in fair value

 

 

2,261

 

Balance at December 31, 2024

 

$

8,386

 

Adjustment to post-closing equity adjustment feature

 

 

(4,000

)

Contingent consideration payments

 

 

(6,370

)

Change in fair value

 

 

2,734

 

Balance at December 31, 2025

 

$

750

 

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis

The Company’s non-financial assets, such as goodwill and long-lived assets are adjusted to fair value when an impairment charge is recognized.

During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we recorded no goodwill impairment.

Long-lived assets include operating lease assets and definite-lived intangible assets. During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we concluded that sufficient indicators existed to require us to perform recoverability tests by comparing the sum of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the assets to their carrying values. Approximately $12.6 million and $4.0 million of impairment charges related to definite-lived intangible assets and operating lease right-of-use assets were recorded in

continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The fair value of these assets at the time of impairment was determined to be zero. To determine fair value, we used the income approach, which assumes that the future cash flows reflect current market expectations. These fair value measurements require significant judgment using Level 3 inputs, such as discounted cash flows from operations, which are not observable from the market, directly or indirectly. There is uncertainty in the projected future cash flows used in the Company’s impairment analysis, which requires the use of estimates and assumptions.

If actual performance does not achieve the projections, or if the assumptions used change in the future, we may be required to recognize impairment charges in future periods.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 27, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 6, 2025

About Fair Value Disclosures

Fair value disclosures classify all assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three-level hierarchy: Level 1 (quoted market prices), Level 2 (observable inputs like yield curves), and Level 3 (unobservable inputs requiring management estimates). The proportion of Level 3 assets directly reflects how much of the balance sheet depends on internal models rather than market evidence.

Key signals: a growing Level 3 balance relative to total fair-value assets increases valuation uncertainty and earnings volatility risk. Watch for transfers between levels — assets moving from Level 2 to Level 3 often signal deteriorating market liquidity. Unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 positions flow through earnings or other comprehensive income, so large swings deserve scrutiny. For financial institutions, examine the sensitivity disclosures that show how Level 3 valuations change under alternative assumptions. Compare the fair value of debt against its carrying amount to gauge hidden leverage.