Fair Value Measurements
The following tables present the fair value hierarchy of financial instruments:
December 31, 2025
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
First lien debt$— $106,617 $13,759,817 $13,866,434 
Second lien debt— — 231,650 231,650 
Unsecured debt— — 12,278 12,278 
Equity438 — 96,494 96,932 
Total$438 $106,617 $14,100,239 $14,207,294 
December 31, 2024
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
First lien debt$— $115,753 $12,714,636 $12,830,389 
Second lien debt— — 119,184 119,184 
Unsecured debt— — 33,521 33,521 
Equity— — 109,424 109,424 
Total$— $115,753 $12,976,765 $13,092,518 
Within Investments at fair value, substantially all Equity investments are illiquid and privately negotiated in nature and are subject to contractual sale constraints or other restrictions pursuant to their respective governing or similar agreements. Approximately $5.8 million of such Equity investments have a sale constraint or other restriction that will lapse after a predetermined date; the weighted average remaining duration of such restrictions is 4.2 years.
The following tables present changes in the fair value of financial instruments for which Level 3 inputs were used to determine the fair value:
For the Year Ended December 31, 2025
First Lien DebtSecond Lien DebtUnsecured DebtEquityTotal
Fair value, beginning of period$12,714,636 $119,184 $33,521 $109,424 $12,976,765 
Purchases of investments3,252,217 112,881 1,877 3,416 3,370,391 
Proceeds from principal repayments and sales of investments(2,183,549)(3,462)(22,548)(12,455)(2,222,014)
Accretion of discount (amortization of premium)51,373 395 76 — 51,844 
Net realized gain (loss)(7,923)— — 7,522 (401)
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)(73,904)2,652 (648)(11,413)(83,313)
Transfers into Level 3 (1)
6,967 — — — 6,967 
Transfers out of Level 3 (1)
— — — — — 
Fair value, end of period$13,759,817 $231,650 $12,278 $96,494 $14,100,239 
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) included in earnings related to financial instruments still held as of December 31, 2025 included in net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on the Consolidated Statements of Operations
$(74,544)$2,166 $(889)$(6,367)$(79,634)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2024
First Lien DebtSecond Lien DebtUnsecured DebtEquityTotal
Fair value, beginning of period$9,564,203 $41,515 $9,924 $94,940 $9,710,582 
Purchases of investments3,911,214 79,441 23,669 14,129 4,028,453 
Proceeds from principal repayments and sales of investments(789,651)(271)— (492)(790,414)
Accretion of discount (amortization of premium)38,337 116 45 — 38,498 
Net realized gain (loss)(19,498)— — 492 (19,006)
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)(34,427)(1,617)(117)355 (35,806)
Transfers into Level 3 (1)
45,260 — — — 45,260 
Transfers out of Level 3 (1)
(802)— — — (802)
Fair value, end of period$12,714,636 $119,184 $33,521 $109,424 $12,976,765 
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) included in earnings related to financial instruments still held as of December 31, 2024 included in net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on the Consolidated Statements of Operations
$(33,283)$(1,619)$(118)$356 $(34,664)
(1)For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, transfers into or out of Level 3 were primarily due to decreased or increased price transparency.
The following tables present quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs of the Company’s Level 3 financial instruments. These tables are not intended to be all-inclusive but instead capture the significant unobservable inputs relevant to the Company’s determination of fair value.
December 31, 2025
Range
Fair ValueValuation TechniqueUnobservable InputLowHigh
Weighted Average (1)
Investments in first lien debt$13,198,498 Yield AnalysisDiscount Rate6.94 %19.36 %9.44 %
462,825 Asset RecoverabilityMarket Multiple7.25x12.47x11.23x
98,494 Market QuotationsBroker quoted price97.25100.0099.97
13,759,817 
Investments in second lien debt231,650 Yield AnalysisDiscount Rate8.45 %15.78 %10.11 %
Investments in unsecured debt12,278 Yield AnalysisDiscount Rate15.10 %15.10 %15.10 %
Investments in equity62,579 Market ApproachPerformance Multiple6.40x33.63x12.28x
19,678 Yield AnalysisDiscount Rate12.50 %19.50 %15.08 %
11,235 Option Pricing Model Expected Volatility32.00 %70.50 %33.34 %
3,002 Asset RecoverabilityMarket Multiple8.50x16.00x11.22x
96,494 
Total$14,100,239 
December 31, 2024
Range
Fair ValueValuation TechniqueUnobservable InputLowHigh
Weighted Average (1)
Investments in first lien debt$12,546,382 Yield AnalysisDiscount Rate7.00 %22.67 %10.15 %
102,316 Market Quotations
Broker Quoted Price
97.00100.57100.08
63,879 Asset RecoverabilityMarket Multiple10.00x10.75x10.40x
2,059 Asset RecoverabilityDiscount Rate10.33 %10.92 %10.36 %
12,714,636 
Investments in second lien debt119,184 Yield AnalysisDiscount Rate8.86 %16.73 %11.52 %
Investments in unsecured debt33,521 Yield AnalysisDiscount Rate7.71%13.94%10.12%
Investments in equity69,633 Market ApproachPerformance Multiple2.30x30.00x10.11x
21,697 Yield AnalysisDiscount Rate9.54 %19.47 %15.55 %
14,499 Option Pricing ModelExpected Volatility23.50 %70.50 %34.03 %
3,166 Asset RecoverabilityMarket Multiple10.00x10.75x10.50x
429 Transaction PriceN/A
109,424 
Total$12,976,765 
(1)Weighted averages are calculated based on fair value of investments.
The significant unobservable input used in the yield analysis is the discount rate based on comparable market yields. Significant increases in discount rates would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement. The significant unobservable input used for market quotations are broker quoted prices provided by independent pricing services. The significant unobservable input used under the market approach is the Performance Multiple. The significant unobservable inputs used under the asset recoverability approach are the market multiple and discount rate. Significant decreases in quoted prices, Performance Multiples, or market multiples would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement. The significant input used in the option pricing model is expected volatility. Significant increases or decreases in expected volatility could result in a significantly higher or significantly lower fair market value measurement, respectively.
Financial Instruments Not Carried at Fair Value
Debt
The fair value of the Company’s SPV Financing Facilities (as defined in Note 7) and Revolving Credit Facility (as defined in Note 7), as of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, approximates their carrying value as the credit facilities have variable interest based on selected short-term rates. These financial instruments would be categorized as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.
The following table presents the fair value measurements of the Company’s Unsecured Notes and Debt Securitization Notes (as defined in Note 7) had they been accounted for at fair value. These financial instruments would be categorized as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024.
December 31, 2025December 31, 2024
Fair ValueFair Value
2026 Notes$799,357 $788,880 
New 2026 Notes691,950 672,420 
2027 Notes632,710 608,725 
2028 Notes615,550 590,200 
November 2027 Notes408,680 406,440 
April 2028 Notes706,370 698,460 
June 2030 Notes497,550 — 
January 2031 Notes494,000 — 
2024-1 Notes457,450 457,568 
Total$5,303,617 $4,222,693 
Other
As of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the carrying amounts of the Company’s other assets and liabilities approximate fair value. These financial instruments, with the exception of cash and cash equivalents (including money market funds classified within Cash and Cash Equivalents in the Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities) which would be categorized as Level 1, would be categorized as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.

About Fair Value Disclosures

Fair value disclosures classify all assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three-level hierarchy: Level 1 (quoted market prices), Level 2 (observable inputs like yield curves), and Level 3 (unobservable inputs requiring management estimates). The proportion of Level 3 assets directly reflects how much of the balance sheet depends on internal models rather than market evidence.

Key signals: a growing Level 3 balance relative to total fair-value assets increases valuation uncertainty and earnings volatility risk. Watch for transfers between levels — assets moving from Level 2 to Level 3 often signal deteriorating market liquidity. Unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 positions flow through earnings or other comprehensive income, so large swings deserve scrutiny. For financial institutions, examine the sensitivity disclosures that show how Level 3 valuations change under alternative assumptions. Compare the fair value of debt against its carrying amount to gauge hidden leverage.