Impact of Prospective Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses. The ASU requires new financial statement disclosures in a tabular format, disaggregating information about certain income expenses. The ASU is effective for the Company on a prospective basis for the Company’s annual disclosures for fiscal 2027 and for interim periods beginning with the first quarter of 2028. Early adoption and retrospective application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the ASU on its consolidated financial statement disclosures.

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40), which amends certain aspects of the accounting for and disclosure of software costs under ASC 350-40. The ASU is intended to clarify and modernize the accounting for costs related to internal-use software. ASU 2025-06 is effective for the Company’s annual disclosure for fiscal 2028, and interim reporting periods beginning with the first quarter of 2028, with early adoption permitted. The guidance may be applied using a prospective, retrospective or modified transition approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the ASU on its consolidated financial statement disclosures.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2026Apr 2, 2026Showing above
2025Apr 1, 2025
2024Apr 2, 2024
2023Mar 28, 2023
2022Mar 28, 2022
2021Mar 30, 2021
2020Mar 31, 2020
2019Apr 3, 2019
2018Apr 4, 2018
2017Mar 28, 2017
2016Mar 29, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.