Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements

Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures

On January 1, 2025, as the result of a new accounting pronouncement, we adopted ASU 2023-09, “Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures,” which amends Topic 740 primarily through enhanced income tax disclosures, improving transparency into the factors affecting income tax expense. The adoption of this accounting pronouncement has resulted in incremental disclosures within Note 9 – Income Taxes.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, “Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses,” which amends Topic 220 primarily through requiring disclosures, in the notes to financial statements, about certain costs and expenses. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted on a prospective or retrospective basis. ASU 2024-03 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2027. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this accounting pronouncement on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, “Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software,” which amends Topic 350 primarily to modernize the accounting for software costs. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual period. A prospective, modified or retrospective transition approach is permitted. ASU 2025-06 becomes effective for us on an interim basis beginning on January 1, 2028. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this accounting pronouncement on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Hedge Accounting Improvements

In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-09, “Hedge Accounting Improvements,” which clarifies certain aspects of the guidance on hedge accounting and addresses several incremental hedge accounting issues arising from the global reference rate reform initiative. The amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within those annual reporting periods, with early adoption permitted on a prospective basis. ASU 2025-09 becomes effective for us on an interim basis beginning on January 1, 2027. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this accounting pronouncement on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Narrow-Scope Improvements

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11, “Narrow-Scope Improvements,” which clarifies interim disclosure requirements and the applicability of Topic 270. The amendments are effective for interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted on a prospective or retrospective basis. ASU 2025-11 becomes effective for us on an interim basis beginning on January 1, 2028. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this accounting pronouncement on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 19, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 14, 2025
2023Feb 16, 2024
2022Feb 16, 2023
2021Feb 17, 2022
2019Feb 20, 2020
2018Feb 21, 2019
2017Feb 22, 2018
2016Feb 21, 2017
2015Feb 24, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.