CareDx, Inc. New Standards Disclosure
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted the new revenue accounting standard Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) ("ASC 606") using the modified retrospective method. The adoption of ASC 606 resulted in a one-time adjustment of $2.9 million to accounts receivable and accumulated deficit on January 1, 2018. The adjustment reflects the estimated payments to be received for tests where the result had been delivered at December 31, 2017, but associated revenue had not been recognized by December 31, 2017, because payment had not been received. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had received payments of $3.4 million for these tests and recorded additional testing revenue of $0.5 million as a change in estimate. The new standard did not impact the Company’s product revenue or license and other revenue, nor did it impact contract assets or contract liabilities.
The following table summarizes the impact of the ASC 606 adoption on accounts receivable as of December 31, 2018 (in thousands):
|
|
|
Balance as Reported |
|
|
Balance without the adoption of ASC 606 |
|
|
Impact of Adoption of ASC 606 |
|
|||
|
Balance Sheets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable |
|
$ |
9,760 |
|
|
$ |
5,424 |
|
|
$ |
4,336 |
|
The following table summarizes the impact to the consolidated statements of operations in accordance with the new revenue standard requirements for the year ended December 31, 2018 (in thousands):
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
Balance As Reported |
|
|
Balance without the adoption of ASC 606 |
|
|
Revenue Impact of adoption of ASC 606 |
|
|||
|
Statements of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Testing revenue |
|
$ |
60,300 |
|
|
$ |
58,661 |
|
|
$ |
1,639 |
|
|
Product revenue |
|
|
15,674 |
|
|
|
15,674 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
License and other revenue |
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
$ |
76,569 |
|
|
$ |
74,930 |
|
|
$ |
1,639 |
|
In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASC 842”), which, for operating leases, requires the lessee to recognize a right-of-use (“ROU”) asset and a lease liability, initially measured at the present value of the lease payments, in its balance sheet. The guidance also requires a lessee to recognize single lease costs, calculated so that the cost of the lease is allocated over the lease term, generally on a straight-line basis. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases. Additionally, the FASB issued ASU, No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, which offers a practical expedient for transitioning at the adoption date. These ASUs will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2019 and the Company has chosen to use this practical expedient and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of the accumulated deficit. The Company has also chosen to apply the package of practical expedients for existing leases, which provides relief from reassessing: (i) whether a contract is or contains a lease, (ii) lease classification, and (iii) whether initial direct costs (IDCs) can be capitalized. The Company has also made some accounting policy elections to: (i) allow the Company not to separate nonlease components from lease components, and instead to account for those as a single lease component, and (ii) elect not to recognize a ROU asset and a lease liability for leases with a term of 12 months or less (“short-term leases”).
The Company has substantially completed an evaluation of the impact of adopting this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures. The Company believes the most significant changes to the consolidated financial statements will be the recognition of ROU assets and offsetting lease liabilities related to operating leases in the consolidated balance sheet. Upon adoption of ASC 842 on January 1, 2019, the Company anticipates that it will record a ROU asset of approximately $3.0 million and a lease liability of approximately $4.0 million.
The Company does not expect the standard to have a material impact on the consolidated statement of cash flows or the consolidated statement of operations. The Company is currently working to complete the implementation of new processes and information technology tools to assist in its ongoing lease data collection and analysis, and updating its accounting policies and internal controls in connection with the adoption of the new standard.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force) (“ASU 2016-15”), to reduce the diversity in practice with respect to the presentation of certain cash flows. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted ASU 2016-15 on January 1, 2018 on a retrospective basis. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force) (“ASU 2016-18”). This guidance requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 is effective for all interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted ASU 2016-18 on January 1, 2018 on a retrospective basis and included restricted cash together with cash and cash equivalents in its consolidated statements of cash flows.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting (“ASU 2017-09”). The amendments provide guidance about how to account for changes to terms or conditions of a share-based payment award required under modification accounting. ASU 2017-09 is effective for all interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted ASU 2017-09 on January 1, 2018 on a prospective basis and the adoption of ASU 2017-09 did not have a material impact to the consolidated financial statements.
In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-11, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features and Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral of Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception (“ASU 2017-11”). ASU 2017-11 is effective for all interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2018 with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2017-11 on January 1, 2018, and the adoption resulted in the JGB common stock warrant liability balance being reclassified to additional paid in capital (Refer to Note 13).
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2018-02”). The amendments in ASU 2018-02 allow a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for certain tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). ASU 2018-02 will become effective for all interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and may be applied retrospectively or as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The Company does not expect that the adoption of the new standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2018-07”). ASU 2018-07 is effective for all interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2018. The Company will adopt ASU 2018-07 on January 1, 2019. The Company is in the process of assessing the impact that the ASU will have in its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal – Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract (“ASU 2018-15”). ASU 2018-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods therein. Early adoption of ASU 2018-15 is permitted including adoption in any interim period. The Company plans to adopt the standard during 2019. The Company expects the new standard will impact its prospective consolidated financial statements after adoption related to implementation costs in a cloud computing arrangement if and when entered by the Company.
Want the next CareDx, Inc. new standards disclosure the moment it drops?
Set a Sentinel and we'll alert you the moment CareDx, Inc.'s next filing hits EDGAR. No credit card, your email never gets sold.
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.