CITY HOLDING COCHCO
CITY HOLDING CO New Standards Disclosure
Recently Adopted
In March 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-01, "Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope Application of Profits Interest Awards." The amendment clarifies how an entity determines whether a profits interest or similar award is within the scope of ASC Topic 718 or not a share-based payment arrangement and therefore within the scope of other guidance. This ASU became effective for the Company on March 31, 2025. The adoption of ASU No. 2024-01 did not have a material impact to the Company's financial statements.
In March 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-02, "Codification Improvements: Amendments to Remove References to the Concepts Statements." The amendment removes various references to the FASB’s Concepts Statements from the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification (Codification or GAAP). This ASU became effective for the Company on March 31, 2025. The adoption of ASU No. 2024-02 did not have a material impact to the Company's financial statements.
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures." The amendment requires companies to disclose, on an annual basis, specific categories in the effective tax rate reconciliation and provide additional information for reconciling items that meet a quantitative threshold. In addition, ASU 2023-09 requires companies to disclose additional information about income taxes paid. This ASU became effective for the Company on December 31, 2025. The adoption of ASU No. 2023-09 was applied on retrospective basis and did not have a material impact to the Company's financial statements. See Note Twelve for additional information.
In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-08, "Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Purchased Loans". The amendment simplifies accounting for acquired loans under CECL by expanding use of the gross-up method to a new category of purchased seasoned loans (PSLs). PSLs are acquired loans purchased more than 90 days after origination or acquired in a business combination. For PSLs, an allowance for credit loss is to be recorded at acquisition with an equal increase to amortized cost and remove credit loss expense on acquisition date. The ASU does not apply to credit cards, Topic 606 trade receivables, and debt securities. The Company elected to early adopt ASU as of December 31, 2025. The adoption of ASU No. 2025-08 did not have a material impact to the Company's financial statements.
Pending Adoption
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, "Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Topic 230): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses." The amendment requires disclosure of disaggregated information about specific expense categories underlying certain income statement expense line items. In January 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-01 to further clarify the guidance noted in ASU No. 2024-03 will become effective for the Company on December 31, 2027. The adoption of ASU No. 2024-03 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.
In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-05, "Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets." The amendment relates to estimating credit losses under CECL for current accounts receivable and current contract assets arising from revenue transactions accounted for under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, including those acquired in a transaction accounted for under ASC 805, Business Combinations. The ASU does not apply to other types of accounts receivable and loans. This ASU will become effective for the Company on March 31, 2026. The adoption of ASU No. 2025-05 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.
In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-09, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Hedge Accounting Improvements". The amendment addresses certain aspects of the hedge accounting guidance in ASC 815 to more closely align hedge accounting with the economics of an entity’s risk management activities. This ASU will become effective for the Company on March 31, 2027. The adoption of ASU No. 2025-09 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-11, "Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow Scope Improvements". The amendment clarifies GAAP interim reporting guidance and formalizes a comprehensive list of required
interim disclosures. This ASU will become effective for the Company on March 31, 2028. The adoption of ASU No. 2025-11 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-12, "Codification Improvements". The amendment provides technical corrections and clarifications across the codification to address unintended application, outdated references, and
minor inconsistencies. This ASU will become effective for the Company on March 31, 2027. The adoption of ASU No. 2025-12 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Feb 25, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Feb 26, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Feb 28, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Feb 22, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Feb 24, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Feb 24, 2021 | |
| 2019 | Feb 27, 2020 | |
| 2018 | Mar 11, 2019 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.