Cinemark Holdings, Inc. Commitments Disclosure

Employment Agreements — As of December 31, 2025, the Company had employment agreements with Sean Gamble, Melissa Thomas, Valmir Fernandes, Wanda Gierhart and Michael Cavalier. These employment agreements are subject to automatic extensions for a one-year period, unless the employment agreements are terminated. The base salaries stipulated in the employment agreements are subject to review at least annually during the term of the agreements for increase (but not decrease) by the Company’s Compensation Committee. Management personnel subject to these employment agreements are eligible to receive annual cash incentive bonuses upon the Company meeting certain performance targets established by the Compensation Committee.

Retirement Savings Plan — The Company has a 401(k) retirement savings plan (“401(k) Plan”) for the benefit of all eligible U.S. based employees and makes discretionary matching contributions as determined annually in accordance with the 401(k) Plan. Employer matching contribution payments of $6.4, $6.9 and $7.2 were made during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2024 and 2025, respectively. A liability of approximately $0.6 was recorded as of December 31, 2025 for employer contribution payments to be made in 2026 for the remaining amounts owed for plan year 2025.

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, the Company is involved in various legal proceedings arising from the ordinary course of its business operations, such as personal injury claims, employment matters, patent claims, landlord-tenant disputes, contractual disputes with landlords over certain termination rights and other contractual disputes, some of which are covered by insurance. The Company believes its potential liability with respect to proceedings currently pending is not material, individually or in the aggregate, to the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Gerardo Rodriguez, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated vs Cinemark USA, Inc. and Cinemark Holdings, Inc., et al. This class action lawsuit was filed against the Company on February 24, 2023 in the Cook County Circuit Court in Illinois alleging violation of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act. The Company firmly maintains that the allegations are without merit and will vigorously defend itself against the lawsuit. The Company cannot predict the outcome of this litigation.

Shane Waldrop, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, vs. Cinemark USA, Inc. This putative nationwide class action lawsuit was filed against the Company on April 16, 2024, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division, alleging violations of the Federal Food Drug & Cosmetics Act, violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, negligent misrepresentation, fraud and unjust enrichment based on the Company’s alleged mislabeling of twenty-four ounce draft beer cups used at certain theaters. The Company denies the allegations and will vigorously defend itself against the lawsuit. The Company cannot predict the outcome of this litigation.

Latishma Narayan, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated vs. Cinemark USA, Inc., Century Theatres, Inc., et al. This class action lawsuit was filed December 27, 2024, in the Superior Court in the State of California for the County of San Mateo alleging violations of the California Labor Code for failure to pay minimum wages, failure to pay wages and overtime, failure to provide meal and rest breaks, failure to pay vacation wages, failure to maintain payroll records, and failure to reimburse necessary expenditures. Cinemark firmly maintains that the contentions of the plaintiff are without merit and will vigorously defend itself against the lawsuit. The Company cannot predict the outcome of this litigation. On July 31, 2025, the court granted Cinemark’s motion to compel arbitration of plaintiff’s claims. On August 30, 2025, plaintiff voluntarily agreed to arbitrate her individual claims. As a result of this development, the Company does not believe that this lawsuit has the potential to have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.