NOTE 22—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES:
The Company is subject to various lawsuits and claims with respect to such matters as personal injury, wrongful death, damage to property, exposure to hazardous substances, governmental regulations including environmental remediation, employment and contract disputes and other claims and actions arising out of the normal course of business. The Company accrues the estimated loss for these lawsuits and claims when the loss is probable and reasonably estimable. The Company’s estimated accruals related to pending claims not discussed below, individually and in the aggregate, are immaterial to the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company as of December 31, 2025. It is possible that the aggregate loss in the future with respect to these lawsuits and claims could ultimately be material to the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows; however, such amounts cannot be reasonably estimated. The amount claimed against the Company as of December 31, 2025 is disclosed below when an amount is expressly stated in the lawsuit or claim, which is not often the case.
United Mine Workers of America 1992 Benefit Plan Litigation: In 2013, Murray Energy and its subsidiaries (“Murray”) entered into a stock purchase agreement (the “Murray sale agreement”) with the Company’s former parent, pursuant to which Murray acquired the stock of Consolidation Coal Company and certain subsidiaries and certain other assets and liabilities. At the time of sale, the liabilities included certain retiree medical liabilities under the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act of 1992 (“Coal Act”) and certain federal black lung liabilities under the Black Lung Benefits Act (“BLBA”). Murray filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in October 2019. As part of the bankruptcy proceedings, Murray unilaterally entered into a settlement with the United Mine Workers of America 1992 Benefit Plan (the “1992 Benefit Plan”) to transfer retirees in the Murray Energy Section 9711 Plan to the 1992 Benefit Plan. This was approved by the bankruptcy court on April 30, 2020. On May 2, 2020, the 1992 Benefit Plan filed an action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia asking the court to make a determination whether the Company’s former parent or the Company has any continuing retiree medical liabilities under the Coal Act (the “1992 Plan Lawsuit”). The Murray sale agreement includes indemnification by Murray with respect to the Coal Act and BLBA liabilities. In addition, the Company had agreed to indemnify its former parent relative to certain pre-separation liabilities. As of September 16, 2020, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Murray and withdrew its claims in bankruptcy. On September 11, 2020, the defendants in the 1992 Plan Lawsuit filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint which was denied by the Court on March 29, 2022. In October 2025, both parties filed a motion for summary judgment. In the 1992 Benefit Plan’s summary judgment motion, it alleged it is entitled to recover reimbursement for unpaid monthly benefits premiums from the beginning of the lawsuit to present in the amount of $64.8 million, plus interest and damages totaling $25.6 million, as well as an unspecified amount of attorneys’ fees. Based upon limited information available at the time of the Murray bankruptcy, the Company estimated that the future annual servicing costs of these liabilities in 2026 are approximately $10.0 million, and the annual servicing cost would decline each year since the beneficiaries of the Coal Act consist principally of miners who retired prior to 1994. No ruling has been issued by the judge. The Company will continue to vigorously defend any claims that attempt to transfer any of such liabilities directly or indirectly to the Company, including raising all applicable defenses against the 1992 Benefit Plan’s suit. With respect to this lawsuit, while a loss is reasonably possible, it is not probable and, as a result, no accrual has been recorded.
The Company and various subsidiaries are defendants in certain other legal proceedings. In the opinion of management, based upon an investigation of these matters and discussion with legal counsel, the ultimate outcome of such other legal proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Employee-related financial guarantees have primarily been provided to support the 1992 Benefit Plan and federal black lung and various state workers’ compensation self-insurance programs. Environmental financial guarantees have primarily been provided to support various performance bonds related to reclamation and other environmental issues. Other
financial guarantees have been extended to support sales contracts, insurance policies, surety indemnity agreements, legal matters, full and timely payments of mining equipment leases, and various other items necessary in the normal course of business. These amounts represent the maximum potential of total future payments that the Company could be required to make under these instruments. Certain letters of credit included in the table below were issued against other commitments included in this table. These amounts have not been reduced for potential recoveries under recourse or collateralization provisions. Generally, recoveries under reclamation bonds would be limited to the extent of the work performed at the time of the default. No amounts related to these commitments are recorded as liabilities in the financial statements. The Company’s management believes that these commitments will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition. The following is a summary of the financial guarantees and letters of credit to certain third parties as of December 31, 2025:
 Amount of Commitment Expiration per Period
 Total
 Amounts
Committed
Less Than
1 Year
1-3 Years3-5 YearsBeyond
5 Years
Letters of Credit:     
Employee-Related$121,970 $98,666 $23,304 $— $— 
Environmental398 — 398 — — 
Other146,012 140,920 5,092 — — 
Total Letters of Credit$268,380 $239,586 $28,794 $— $— 
Surety Bonds:    
Employee-Related$116,978 $115,678 $1,300 $— $— 
Environmental859,358 796,684 62,674 — — 
Other95,693 95,446 247 — — 
Total Surety Bonds$1,072,029 $1,007,808 $64,221 $— $— 
The Company regularly evaluates the likelihood of default for all guarantees based on an expected loss analysis and records the fair value, if any, of its guarantees as an obligation in the financial statements.
Business Interruption Insurance Recoveries
On March 26, 2024, a container ship struck a support column of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, Maryland causing it to collapse, which suspended vessel access to, and export capability from, the Core Marine Terminal, located in the Port of Baltimore. On May 20, 2024, a limited access channel in the Chesapeake Bay was opened to commercial vessel traffic; the permanent 700-foot wide, 50-foot deep channel was restored and opened on June 10, 2024.
In the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company recorded insurance recoveries of $9,003, which represents an advancement from the Company’s insurance carriers related to the Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse business interruption insurance claim. In the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company recorded insurance recoveries of $24,862, which represents a portion of the total settlement related to the Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse business interruption insurance claim. These amounts were recorded in Other Operating Income and Expense, net on the Consolidated Statements of (Loss) Income.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 17, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 20, 2025
2023Feb 9, 2024
2022Feb 10, 2023
2019Feb 14, 2020

About Commitments Disclosures

Commitments and contingencies disclosures catalog a company's off-balance-sheet obligations and legal exposures — purchase commitments, guarantee arrangements, pending litigation, and regulatory proceedings. These items represent potential future cash outflows that may not appear as liabilities on the balance sheet until they become probable and estimable.

Key signals: litigation reserves and disclosed loss ranges quantify management's estimate of legal exposure, but unquantified "reasonably possible" losses often represent the larger risk. Watch for changes in language around pending cases — shifts from "remote" to "reasonably possible" or increases in estimated loss ranges signal deteriorating outcomes. Unconditional purchase obligations and take-or-pay contracts create fixed cost structures that reduce operational flexibility. Guarantee arrangements for subsidiaries or joint ventures can create cascading obligations. Compare the total commitment schedule against projected free cash flow to assess whether the company can meet its obligations without additional financing.